BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23569136)

  • 1. Long-term clinical effects of programmer-guided atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization: Intracardiac electrography versus echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.
    Wang D; Yu H; Yun T; Zang H; Yang G; Wang S; Wang Z; Jing Q; Han Y
    J Int Med Res; 2013 Feb; 41(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 23569136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-Term Effect of Different Optimizing Methods for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure: A Randomized and Controlled Pilot Study.
    Zhang Y; Xing Q; Zhang JH; Jiang WF; Qin M; Liu X
    Cardiology; 2019; 142(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 31189165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whether noninvasive optimization of AV and VV delays improves the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Urbanek B; Chudzik M; Klimczak A; Rosiak M; Lewek J; Wranicz JK
    Cardiol J; 2013; 20(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 23913460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of an intracardiac electrogram-based atrioventricular and interventricular intervals optimization method in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Hua W; Wang DM; Cai L; Sun CF; Fu GS; Wang YT; Yan J; Luo ZL; Xu J; Wang ZY; Xu G; Shen FR; Xu W; Wang JF; Ren XJ; Jin W; Zhang N; Lau EO; Zhang S
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Feb; 125(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 22490397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective comparison of echocardiography and device algorithms for atrioventricular and interventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Kamdar R; Frain E; Warburton F; Richmond L; Mullan V; Berriman T; Thomas G; Tenkorang J; Dhinoja M; Earley M; Sporton S; Schilling R
    Europace; 2010 Jan; 12(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 19892713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Programmed versus effective VV delay during CRT optimization: when what you see is not what you get.
    Bogaard MD; Meine M; Doevendans PA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 36(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 23305237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of AV delay and VV delay on left atrial pressure and waveform in ambulant heart failure patients: insights into CRT optimization.
    Chan WY; Blomqvist A; Melton IC; Norén K; Crozier IG; Benser ME; Eigler NL; Gutfinger D; Troughton RW
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 37(7):810-9. PubMed ID: 24502608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac resynchronization therapy beyond nominal settings: who needs individual programming of the atrioventricular and interventricular delay?
    Bogaard MD; Meine M; Tuinenburg AE; Maskara B; Loh P; Doevendans PA
    Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1746-53. PubMed ID: 22753868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of quick optimization of interventricular delay between simple methods: intracardiac electrogram and surface electrocardiogram after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Cheng CM; Huang JL; Wu TJ; Su CS; Pai HY; Liao MF; Ting CT; Chen SA
    Europace; 2012 Sep; 14(9):1317-23. PubMed ID: 22490372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual Intracardiac Electrogram Method Is Accurate Alternative to Echocardiography for Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Pezo Nikolić B; Lovrić D; Ljubas Maček J; Rešković Lukšić V; Matasić R; Šeparović Hanževački J
    Acta Clin Croat; 2017 Dec; 56(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 29590714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of QuickOpt optimization in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure treated by cardiac resynchronization.
    Yan J; Zhang S; Huang D; Xue X; Xu J; Tao Q; Zhang W; Zhang Z; Hua W; Liang Y; Tang B; Xu W; Xu G; Ren X; Wang J; Guo T; Jia S; Dong Y; Jiang H; Fu G; Zhu L; Chen L; Tian F; Ling F; Li J; Qi X; Hao Y; Wang Y; Zheng L; Pu X; Shen F; Li G; Li H; Peng F
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4259. PubMed ID: 29523823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: variations in echo-guided optimized atrioventricular and interventricular delays during follow-up.
    Valzania C; Biffi M; Martignani C; Diemberger I; Bertini M; Ziacchi M; Bacchi L; Rocchi G; Rapezzi C; Branzi A; Boriani G
    Echocardiography; 2007 Oct; 24(9):933-9. PubMed ID: 17894571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discordant electrical and mechanical atrial delays affect intracavitary electrogram-based cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization.
    Porciani MC; Ricceri I; Attanà P; Pennesi M; Michelotti F; Mascia G; Sacchi S; Hashtroudi L; Padeletti L
    Europace; 2012 Apr; 14(4):593-8. PubMed ID: 22041885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute evaluation of programmer-guided AV/PV and VV delay optimization comparing an IEGM method and echocardiogram for cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients and dual-chamber ICD implants.
    Baker JH; McKenzie J; Beau S; Greer GS; Porterfield J; Fedor M; Greenberg S; Daoud EG; Corbisiero R; Bailey JR; Porterfield L
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17338767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical response with adaptive CRT algorithm compared with CRT with echocardiography-optimized atrioventricular delay: a retrospective analysis of multicentre trials.
    Singh JP; Abraham WT; Chung ES; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Coles JA; Martin DO
    Europace; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1622-8. PubMed ID: 24014804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of AV and VV delays in the real-world CRT patient population: an international survey on current clinical practice.
    Gras D; Gupta MS; Boulogne E; Guzzo L; Abraham WT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S236-9. PubMed ID: 19250104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect Evaluation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure by Ultrasound Image under QuickOpt Algorithm.
    Hu N; Yi N; Yang H
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():8680446. PubMed ID: 35712000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of frequent optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Frequent Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method (FREEDOM) trial.
    Abraham WT; Gras D; Yu CM; Guzzo L; Gupta MS;
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jun; 159(6):944-948.e1. PubMed ID: 20569704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of acoustic cardiography and echocardiography for optimizing pacemaker settings in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Zuber M; Toggweiler S; Quinn-Tate L; Brown L; Amkieh A; Erne P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 31(7):802-11. PubMed ID: 18684276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary results from the SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: a randomized trial comparing empirical, echocardiography-guided, and algorithmic atrioventricular delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Ellenbogen KA; Gold MR; Meyer TE; Fernndez Lozano I; Mittal S; Waggoner AD; Lemke B; Singh JP; Spinale FG; Van Eyk JE; Whitehill J; Weiner S; Bedi M; Rapkin J; Stein KM
    Circulation; 2010 Dec; 122(25):2660-8. PubMed ID: 21098426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.