161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2356922)
1. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive.
Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 1990 Jul; 14(7):626-32. PubMed ID: 2356922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.
Goharderakhshan RZ; Sudilovsky D; Carroll LA; Grossfeld GD; Marn R; Carroll PR
Urology; 2002 May; 59(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 11992845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excision of the neurovascular bundle at radical prostatectomy in cases with perineural invasion on needle biopsy.
Holmes GF; Walsh PC; Pound CR; Epstein JI
Urology; 1999 Apr; 53(4):752-6. PubMed ID: 10197851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer with established capsular penetration.
Partin AW; Borland RN; Epstein JI; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1993 Jul; 150(1):142-6; discussion 146-8. PubMed ID: 8510234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Epstein JI; Pizov G; Walsh PC
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3582-93. PubMed ID: 7683970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical safety and feasibility of a newly developed, simple algorithm for decision-making on neurovascular bundle preservation in radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Hisasue S; Masumori N; Kobayashi K; Kato R; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 40(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19959505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurovascular bundle resection: does it improve the margins?
Lepor H; Tareen B
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 20219562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):1943-8; discussion 1948-9. PubMed ID: 11371886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prostatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors.
Shah R; Bassily N; Wei J; Mucci NR; Montie JE; Sanda MG; Rubin MA
Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):721-5. PubMed ID: 11068287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy: overview of sampling methods for frozen sections and techniques for the secondary resection of the neurovascular bundles.
Sighinolfi MC; Eissa A; Spandri V; Puliatti S; Micali S; Reggiani Bonetti L; Bertoni L; Bianchi G; Rocco B
BJU Int; 2020 May; 125(5):656-663. PubMed ID: 32012426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Erectile Function Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High Risk Features.
Recabal P; Assel M; Musser JE; Caras RJ; Sjoberg DD; Coleman JA; Mulhall JP; Parra RO; Scardino PT; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Laudone VP
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 26905018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Site-specific positive margins at radical prostatectomy: assessing cancer-control benefits of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle on a side with cancer on biopsy.
Park EL; Dalkin B; Escobar C; Nagle RB
BJU Int; 2003 Feb; 91(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 12581008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rosen MA; Goldstone L; Lapin S; Wheeler T; Scardino PT
J Urol; 1992 Aug; 148(2 Pt 1):331-7. PubMed ID: 1635129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study.
Fromont G; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Validire P; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1843-6. PubMed ID: 14532789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of frozen sections to assess surgical margins during radical prostatectomy].
Varvello F; Conti E; Camilli M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
Urologia; 2013 Apr; 80 Suppl 22():39-43. PubMed ID: 23334884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extended followup of the influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and extensive capsular perforation.
Smith RC; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1996 Aug; 156(2 Pt 1):454-7; discussion 457-8. PubMed ID: 8683701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
