These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23570079)

  • 1. [Homebirth in Czech Republic].
    Konigsmarkova I
    Ceska Gynekol; 2012 Dec; 77(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 23570079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planned home births in the Czech Republic, 2018.
    Vintrová J; Pařízek A
    Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(3):204-211. PubMed ID: 30764621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The safety of home birth and evidence-based medicine].
    Křepelka P; Velebil P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2012 Dec; 77(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 23521199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Brent RL; Levene MI; Arabin B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.
    Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Brent RL; Arabin B; Levene MI; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25446661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey.
    Sassine H; Burns E; Ormsby S; Dahlen HG
    Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 32636161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands.
    Christiaens W; Bracke P
    Midwifery; 2009 Apr; 25(2):e11-9. PubMed ID: 17512100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal factors and the probability of a planned home birth.
    Anthony S; Buitendijk SE; Offerhaus PM; Dommelen P; Pal-de Bruin KM
    BJOG; 2005 Jun; 112(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 15924531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications of planned home births in the Czech Republic between 2016‒2017.
    Křepelka P; Velebil P; Měchurová A; Straňák Z; Feyereisl J
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2020 Sep; 28(3):230-236. PubMed ID: 32997480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A description of the management and outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean birth in the homebirth setting.
    Latendresse G; Murphy PA; Fullerton JT
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 16154065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Canadian Birth Place Study: describing maternity practice and providers' exposure to home birth.
    Vedam S; Schummers L; Stoll K; Rogers J; Klein MC; Fairbrother N; Dharamsi S; Liston R; Chong GK; Kaczorowski J
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 22925396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Praxis and guidelines for planned homebirths in the Nordic countries - an overview.
    Lindgren H; Kjaergaard H; Olafsdottir OA; Blix E
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2014 Mar; 5(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 24472383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Brent RL; Arabin B; Levene MI; Chervenak FA
    J Perinat Med; 2015 Jul; 43(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 24756040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth.
    Lindgren HE; Rådestad IJ; Christensson K; Wally-Bystrom K; Hildingsson IM
    Midwifery; 2010 Apr; 26(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18602202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths.
    Jackson M; Dahlen H; Schmied V
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):561-7. PubMed ID: 22300611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Northampton homebirth team.
    O'Connell S; Richley A; Williams B
    Pract Midwife; 2012 Nov; 15(10):19-20, 22. PubMed ID: 23243828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
    Stoll K; Kornelsen J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of maternal mortality in the Czech Republic in 2000].
    Srp B; Velebil P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2002 Sep; 67(5):268-74. PubMed ID: 12434662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.