162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23570435)
21. Economic evaluation of the 70-gene prognosis-signature (MammaPrint®) in hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early stage breast cancer in Japan.
Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Ishiguro H; Toi M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(2):759-68. PubMed ID: 22315134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.
Kip M; Monteban H; Steuten L
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 25872415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-effectiveness of 70-gene MammaPrint signature in node-negative breast cancer.
Chen E; Tong KB; Malin JL
Am J Manag Care; 2010 Dec; 16(12):e333-42. PubMed ID: 21291290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Economic Impact of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in France.
Katz G; Romano O; Foa C; Vataire AL; Chantelard JV; Hervé R; Barletta H; Durieux A; Martin JP; Salmon R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128880. PubMed ID: 26086912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is the Oncotype DX assay necessary in strongly estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers?
Lee JJ; Shen J
Am Surg; 2011 Oct; 77(10):1364-7. PubMed ID: 22127090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.
Hornberger J; Cosler LE; Lyman GH
Am J Manag Care; 2005 May; 11(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 15898220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Benefits of introduction of Oncotype DX
Green N; Al-Allak A; Fowler C
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 Jan; 101(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 30322288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients.
Habel LA; Shak S; Jacobs MK; Capra A; Alexander C; Pho M; Baker J; Walker M; Watson D; Hackett J; Blick NT; Greenberg D; Fehrenbacher L; Langholz B; Quesenberry CP
Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(3):R25. PubMed ID: 16737553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Health economic analysis of Breast Cancer Index in patients with ER+, LN- breast cancer.
Gustavsen G; Schroeder B; Kennedy P; Pothier KC; Erlander MG; Schnabel CA; Ali H
Am J Manag Care; 2014 Aug; 20(8):e302-10. PubMed ID: 25295793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: does the use of Oncotype DX tumor gene expression profiling to guide treatment decisions improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer?
Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group*
Genet Med; 2016 Aug; 18(8):770-9. PubMed ID: 26681310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions.
Henry LR; Stojadinovic A; Swain SM; Prindiville S; Cordes R; Soballe PW
J Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 99(6):319-23. PubMed ID: 19204954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Commercialized multigene predictors of clinical outcome for breast cancer.
Ross JS; Hatzis C; Symmans WF; Pusztai L; Hortobágyi GN
Oncologist; 2008 May; 13(5):477-93. PubMed ID: 18515733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Complementary value of the Ki-67 proliferation index to the oncotype DX recurrence score.
Gwin K; Pinto M; Tavassoli FA
Int J Surg Pathol; 2009 Aug; 17(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 19578051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Chemotherapy Delivery in Breast Cancer.
Rutter CE; Yao X; Mancini BR; Aminawung JA; Chagpar AB; Saglam O; Hofstatter EW; Abu-Khalaf M; Gross CP; Evans SB
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 26483315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Associations between use of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and chemotherapy regimen selection in a statewide registry.
Henry NL; Braun TM; Ali HY; Munir K; Silver SM; Gorski DH; Breslin TM; Griggs JJ
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):948-956. PubMed ID: 27787892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-effectiveness of letrozole in the extended adjuvant treatment of women with early breast cancer.
El Ouagari K; Karnon J; Delea T; Talbot W; Brandman J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 16821085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. BreastPRS is a gene expression assay that stratifies intermediate-risk Oncotype DX patients into high- or low-risk for disease recurrence.
D'Alfonso TM; van Laar RK; Vahdat LT; Hussain W; Flinchum R; Brown N; John LS; Shin SJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):705-15. PubMed ID: 23774991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-effectiveness of 21-gene assay in node-positive, early-stage breast cancer.
Vanderlaan BF; Broder MS; Chang EY; Oratz R; Bentley TG
Am J Manag Care; 2011; 17(7):455-64. PubMed ID: 21819166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gene-expression assays: new tools to individualize treatment of early-stage breast cancer.
Dobbe E; Gurney K; Kiekow S; Lafferty JS; Kolesar JM
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2008 Jan; 65(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 18159035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical evidence supporting genomic tests in early breast cancer: Do all genomic tests provide the same information?
Markopoulos C; van de Velde C; Zarca D; Ozmen V; Masetti R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):909-920. PubMed ID: 27639633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
