These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23570626)

  • 1. Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces.
    De Munck J; Luehrs AK; Poitevin A; Van Ende A; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):635-44. PubMed ID: 23570626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial fracture toughness of aged adhesive-dentin interfaces.
    De Munck J; Poitevin A; Lührs AK; Pongprueksa P; Van Ende A; Van Landuyt KL; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2015 Apr; 31(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 25703341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin Bonding Testing Using a Mini-interfacial Fracture Toughness Approach.
    Pongprueksa P; De Munck J; Karunratanakul K; Barreto BC; Van Ende A; Senawongse P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent Res; 2016 Mar; 95(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 26608579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic versus static bond-strength testing of adhesive interfaces.
    Poitevin A; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Mine A; Peumans M; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2010 Nov; 26(11):1068-76. PubMed ID: 20701960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlative analysis of cement-dentin interfaces using an interfacial fracture toughness and micro-tensile bond strength approach.
    Souza EM; De Munck J; Pongprueksa P; Van Ende A; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1575-1585. PubMed ID: 27771139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Method to compare mu-tensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive and mu-cohesive strength of adjacent dentin.
    de la Macorra JC; San-Nicolás A
    Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):946-53. PubMed ID: 15878782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces.
    Tam LE; Pilliar RM
    J Dent Res; 1993 May; 72(5):953-9. PubMed ID: 8501294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of artificial aging and surface treatment on bond strengths to dental zirconia.
    Perdigão J; Fernandes SD; Pinto AM; Oliveira FA
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 22788723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strength of caries-affected human dentine after three different caries removal techniques.
    Sirin Karaarslan E; Yildiz E; Cebe MA; Yegin Z; Ozturk B
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):793-801. PubMed ID: 22687577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mode of failure in the dentin-adhesive resin-resin composite bonded joint as determined by strength-based (muTBS) and fracture-based (CNSB) mechanical testing.
    Armstrong SR; Keller JC; Boyer DB
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 11257292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; D'Amario M; Zazzeroni S; Ciampoli C; Caputi S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 19544823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin.
    Shirai K; De Munck J; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Lambrechts P; Suzuki K; Shintani H; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 15681009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems.
    Dunn WJ; Söderholm KJ
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 11803994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond durability of adhesives containing modified-monomer with/without-fluoride after aging in artificial saliva and under intrapulpal pressure simulation.
    El-Deeb HA; Al Sherbiney HH; Mobarak EH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22770483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.
    Korkmaz Y; Gurgan S; Firat E; Nathanson D
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 20166411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of blood contamination on microtensile bond strength to dentin of three self-etch adhesives.
    Chang SW; Cho BH; Lim RY; Kyung SH; Park DS; Oh TS; Yoo HM
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 20533634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of ultrasound and diamond burs treatments on microtensile bond strength.
    Conde A; Mainieri V; Mota EG; Oshima HM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 23059576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.