BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23570709)

  • 1. The digital MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments.
    Huggett JF; Foy CA; Benes V; Emslie K; Garson JA; Haynes R; Hellemans J; Kubista M; Mueller RD; Nolan T; Pfaffl MW; Shipley GL; Vandesompele J; Wittwer CT; Bustin SA
    Clin Chem; 2013 Jun; 59(6):892-902. PubMed ID: 23570709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Digital MIQE Guidelines Update: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments for 2020.
    ; Huggett JF
    Clin Chem; 2020 Aug; 66(8):1012-1029. PubMed ID: 32746458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations for digital PCR as an accurate molecular diagnostic tool.
    Huggett JF; Cowen S; Foy CA
    Clin Chem; 2015 Jan; 61(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 25338683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the real-time PCR and different digital PCR platforms for DNA quantification.
    Pavšič J; Žel J; Milavec M
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Jan; 408(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 26521179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute DNA quantification.
    Sanders R; Huggett JF; Bushell CA; Cowen S; Scott DJ; Foy CA
    Anal Chem; 2011 Sep; 83(17):6474-84. PubMed ID: 21446772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.
    Bustin SA; Benes V; Garson JA; Hellemans J; Huggett J; Kubista M; Mueller R; Nolan T; Pfaffl MW; Shipley GL; Vandesompele J; Wittwer CT
    Clin Chem; 2009 Apr; 55(4):611-22. PubMed ID: 19246619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of digital PCR and real-time qPCR for the detection and quantification of HPV mRNA in sentinel lymph nodes of cervical cancer patients.
    Carow K; Read C; Häfner N; Runnebaum IB; Corner A; Dürst M
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Oct; 10(1):532. PubMed ID: 29084579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum information necessary for quantitative real-time PCR experiments.
    Johnson G; Nour AA; Nolan T; Huggett J; Bustin S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1160():5-17. PubMed ID: 24740217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why the need for qPCR publication guidelines?--The case for MIQE.
    Bustin SA
    Methods; 2010 Apr; 50(4):217-26. PubMed ID: 20025972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The state of RT-quantitative PCR: firsthand observations of implementation of minimum information for the publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments (MIQE).
    Taylor SC; Mrkusich EM
    J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 24296827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the guide to good practices MIQE: adapting and relevance in the clinical biology context].
    Dooms M; Chango A; Abdel-Nour A
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2014; 72(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 24876137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Ultimate qPCR Experiment: Producing Publication Quality, Reproducible Data the First Time.
    Taylor SC; Nadeau K; Abbasi M; Lachance C; Nguyen M; Fenrich J
    Trends Biotechnol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):761-774. PubMed ID: 30654913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital PCR and its applications in noninvasive prenatal testing.
    Li YQ; Tan GJ; Zhou YQ
    Brief Funct Genomics; 2022 Sep; 21(5):376-386. PubMed ID: 35923115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA.
    Pavšič J; Devonshire A; Blejec A; Foy CA; Van Heuverswyn F; Jones GM; Schimmel H; Žel J; Huggett JF; Redshaw N; Karczmarczyk M; Mozioğlu E; Akyürek S; Akgöz M; Milavec M
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2017 Apr; 409(10):2601-2614. PubMed ID: 28124757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of sensitivity, linearity, and resistance to inhibition of digital and nondigital polymerase chain reaction and loop mediated isothermal amplification assays for quantification of human cytomegalovirus.
    Nixon G; Garson JA; Grant P; Nastouli E; Foy CA; Huggett JF
    Anal Chem; 2014 May; 86(9):4387-94. PubMed ID: 24684191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Duplex Digital PCR Assay for Simultaneous Quantification of the Enterococcus spp. and the Human Fecal-associated HF183 Marker in Waters.
    Cao Y; Raith MR; Griffith JF
    J Vis Exp; 2016 Mar; (109):. PubMed ID: 27023488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Five years MIQE guidelines: the case of the Arabian countries.
    Abdel Nour AM; Azhar E; Damanhouri G; Bustin SA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88266. PubMed ID: 24505456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital PCR analysis of circulating nucleic acids.
    Hudecova I
    Clin Biochem; 2015 Oct; 48(15):948-56. PubMed ID: 25828047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. dPCR: A Technology Review.
    Quan PL; Sauzade M; Brouzes E
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29677144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Droplet digital PCR technology promises new applications and research areas.
    Manoj P
    Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal; 2016; 27(1):742-6. PubMed ID: 24779593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.