BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23571070)

  • 1. Sperm Hy-Liter™: an effective tool for the detection of spermatozoa in sexual assault exhibits.
    De Moors A; Georgalis T; Armstrong G; Modler J; Frégeau CJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 23571070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SPERM HY-LITER™ for the identification of spermatozoa from sexual assault evidence.
    Westring CG; Wiuf M; Nielsen SJ; Fogleman JC; Old JB; Lenz C; Reich KA; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():161-7. PubMed ID: 24997321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developmental validation of the SPERM HY-LITER™ kit for the identification of human spermatozoa in forensic samples.
    Miller KW; Old J; Fischer BR; Schweers B; Stipinaite S; Reich K
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):853-65. PubMed ID: 21595688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of spermatozoa detection using immunofluorescent staining and laser micro-dissection.
    Ping YS; Chan XL; Goh SK; Syn CK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():72-9. PubMed ID: 26338669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a quantitative validation method for forensic investigation of human spermatozoa using a commercial fluorescence staining kit (SPERM HY-LITER™ Express).
    Takamura A; Watanabe K; Akutsu T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1421-1429. PubMed ID: 27184658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postmortem identification of spermatozoa on human skin based on fluorescent monoclonal antibody method.
    Elshama SS; Aly SM; Abdalla ME; Hassan WA
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 29363898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced forensic validation for human spermatozoa identification using SPERM HY-LITER™ Express with quantitative image analysis.
    Takamura A; Watanabe K; Akutsu T
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jul; 131(4):933-939. PubMed ID: 28102433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immunohistochemical staining of human sperm cells in smears from sexual assault cases.
    Christoffersen S
    Int J Legal Med; 2011 Nov; 125(6):887-90. PubMed ID: 21887534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low copy number DNA profiling from isolated sperm using the aureka®-micromanipulation system.
    Schneider C; Müller U; Kilper R; Siebertz B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jul; 6(4):461-5. PubMed ID: 22155149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
    Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
    Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
    Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
    Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a rapid, 96-well alkaline based differential DNA extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
    Hudlow WR; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21288791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
    Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic detection of spermatozoa for laser capture microdissection.
    Vandewoestyne M; Van Hoofstat D; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Deforce D
    Int J Legal Med; 2009 Mar; 123(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18661142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of spermatozoa detection using the genital swab versus bedside smear slide technique in sexual assault patients.
    Sathirareuangchai S; Phobtrakul R; Phetsangharn L; Srisopa K; Petchpunya S
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Oct; 35():69-72. PubMed ID: 26344463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
    Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of the subjectivity of sperm scoring.
    Tobe SS; Dennany L; Vennemann M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jun; 251():83-6. PubMed ID: 25863702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.