These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Oscillometry and applanation tonometry measurements in older individuals with elevated levels of arterial stiffness. van Dijk SC; Enneman AW; Swart KM; van Schoor NM; Uitterlinden AG; Smulders YM; van den Meiracker AH; van der Velde N; Mattace-Raso FU Blood Press Monit; 2013 Dec; 18(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 24192847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of oscillometric aortic pressure and stiffness assessment using the VaSera VS-1500: comparison with a common tonometric method. Endes S; Bachler M; Li Y; Mayer C; Hanssen H; Hametner B; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Wassertheurer S Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 26065840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry. Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic pulse wave velocity and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: similarities and discrepancies. Podolec P; Kopeć G; Podolec J; Wilkołek P; Krochin M; Rubiś P; Cwynar M; Grodzicki T; Zmudka K; Tracz W Hypertens Res; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1151-8. PubMed ID: 18344619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A magnetic resonance perspective of the pulse wave transit time by the Arteriograph device and potential for improving aortic length estimation for central pulse wave velocity. Rezai MR; Cowan BR; Sherratt N; Finn JD; Wu FC; Cruickshank JK Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 23324879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of pulse wave velocity measured using a brachial cuff in a community setting. Nunan D; Fleming S; Hametner B; Wassertheurer S Blood Press Monit; 2014 Dec; 19(6):315-9. PubMed ID: 25000541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study. Papaioannou TG; Argyris A; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Nasothimiou EG; Sfikakis PP; Stergiou GS; Stefanadis CI Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24063914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic pulse wave velocity results depend on which carotid artery is used for the measurements. Dzeko M; Peters CD; Kjaergaard KD; Jensen JD; Jespersen B J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 23221934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applanation tonometry: a reliable technique to assess aortic pulse wave velocity in spinal cord injury. Currie KD; Hubli M; Krassioukov AV Spinal Cord; 2014 Apr; 52(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 24445978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oscillometric analysis compared with cardiac magnetic resonance for the assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity in patients with myocardial infarction. Feistritzer HJ; Klug G; Reinstadler SJ; Reindl M; Mayr A; Schocke M; Metzler B J Hypertens; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1746-51. PubMed ID: 27379534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validating a new oscillometric device for aortic pulse wave velocity measurements in children and adolescents. Kracht D; Shroff R; Baig S; Doyon A; Jacobi C; Zeller R; Querfeld U; Schaefer F; Wühl E; Schmidt BM; Melk A; Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1294-9. PubMed ID: 21866186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Shahin Y; Barakat H; Barnes R; Chetter I Hypertens Res; 2013 Mar; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 23034469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pilot study comparison of a new method for aortic pulse wave velocity measurements using transthoracic bioimpedance and thigh cuff oscillometry with the standard tonometric method. Brinkmann J; Jordan J; Tank J J Am Soc Hypertens; 2015 Apr; 9(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 25816714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric reference values of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity determined with an oscillometric device. Fischer DC; Schreiver C; Heimhalt M; Noerenberg A; Haffner D J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 30(11):2159-67. PubMed ID: 22940681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two generalized transfer functions for measuring central systolic blood pressure by an oscillometric blood pressure monitor. Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH J Hum Hypertens; 2013 Mar; 27(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 22551938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method. Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH Am J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 22874891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of an oscillometric method with cardiac magnetic resonance for the analysis of aortic pulse wave velocity. Feistritzer HJ; Reinstadler SJ; Klug G; Kremser C; Seidner B; Esterhammer R; Schocke MF; Franz WM; Metzler B PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116862. PubMed ID: 25612307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reproducibility of arterial pulse wave velocity measurement using new device with oscillometric technique: a pilot study. Naidu MU; Reddy BM; Yashmaina S; Patnaik AN; Rani PU Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Aug; 4():49. PubMed ID: 16115324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]