416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23572497)
1. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT versus FDG-PET/CT response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Johannesen HH; Nielsen D; Schou JV; Jensen BV; Høgdall EV; Hendel HW
Cancer Med; 2014 Oct; 3(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24941936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Pfeiffer P; Hendel HW
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(9-10):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 27548393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Shang J; Ling X; Zhang L; Tang Y; Xiao Z; Cheng Y; Guo B; Gong J; Huang L; Xu H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1945-53. PubMed ID: 27236466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST.
Depardon E; Kanoun S; Humbert O; Bertaut A; Riedinger JM; Tal I; Vrigneaud JM; Lasserre M; Toubeau M; Berriolo-Riedinger A; Dygai-Cochet I; Fumoleau P; Brunotte F; Cochet A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199529. PubMed ID: 30011328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The utility of
Kitajima K; Kawanaka Y; Komoto H; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Nakamura A; Hashimoto M; Kondo N; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(3):186-198. PubMed ID: 34901959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TLG-S criteria are superior to both EORTC and PERCIST for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib.
Ho KC; Fang YD; Chung HW; Liu YC; Chang JW; Hou MM; Yang CT; Cheng NM; Su TP; Yen TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Nov; 43(12):2155-2165. PubMed ID: 27260520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) 1.0 for evaluation of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to predict survival early during treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Fledelius J; Khalil AA; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiaer J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 26678718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Therapy response evaluation with FDG-PET/CT in small cell lung cancer: a prognostic and comparison study of the PERCIST and EORTC criteria.
Ziai D; Wagner T; El Badaoui A; Hitzel A; Woillard JB; Melloni B; Monteil J
Cancer Imaging; 2013 Mar; 13(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 23466871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive value of early 18F-FDG PET/CT studies for treatment response evaluation to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: preliminary results of an ongoing study.
Sachpekidis C; Larribere L; Pan L; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Hassel JC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 42(3):386-96. PubMed ID: 25359635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using
Kitajima K; Watabe T; Nakajo M; Ishibashi M; Daisaki H; Soeda F; Tanemura A; Kanekura T; Yamazaki N; Ito K
Jpn J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 34287739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of interim
Sachpekidis C; Anwar H; Winkler J; Kopp-Schneider A; Larribere L; Haberkorn U; Hassel JC; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(8):1289-1296. PubMed ID: 29478079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What
Turgeon GA; Iravani A; Akhurst T; Beaulieu A; Callahan JW; Bressel M; Cole AJ; Everitt SJ; Siva S; Hicks RJ; Ball DL; Mac Manus MP
J Nucl Med; 2019 Mar; 60(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30030343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pilot study on EORTC or PERCIST for the prediction of progression-free survival with nivolumab therapy in advanced or metastatic gastric cancers: A STROBE-compliant article.
Nakajo M; Kitajima K; Toriihara A; Arigami T; Daisaki H; Nakamura A; Ohtsuka T; Miwa H; Yoshiura T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(15):e25494. PubMed ID: 33847661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors.
Nasir Z; Mahmood T; Adel H; Nausheen S; Hamid S; Sattar A; Manohar M
Cureus; 2019 Aug; 11(8):e5422. PubMed ID: 31632874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for response evaluation in recurrent carcinoma cervix: does metabolic response predict survival?
Dhull VS; Sharma P; Sharma DN; Maharjan S; Suman Kc S; Patel C; Bal C; Kumar R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 24407578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection and characterization of tumor changes in 18F-FDG PET patient monitoring using parametric imaging.
Necib H; Garcia C; Wagner A; Vanderlinden B; Emonts P; Hendlisz A; Flamen P; Buvat I
J Nucl Med; 2011 Mar; 52(3):354-61. PubMed ID: 21345787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing RECIST with EORTC criteria in metastatic bladder cancer.
Öztürk H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Jan; 142(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 26208817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria, and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors for evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy and prognosis prediction in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Kitajima K; Maruyama M; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Hashimoto M; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Aug; 41(8):790-799. PubMed ID: 32516245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interim [
Sachpekidis C; Kopp-Schneider A; Pan L; Papamichail D; Haberkorn U; Hassel JC; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 48(6):1932-1943. PubMed ID: 33336264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
