159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23573059)
1. The Use of a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Increases Successful Implantation Rates in Patients with Phrenic Nerve Stimulation and/or High Pacing Thresholds Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy with Conventional Bipolar Leads.
Ohlow MA; Lauer B; Brunelli M; Daralammouri Y; Geller C
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J; 2013 Mar; 13(2):58-65. PubMed ID: 23573059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.
Mehta PA; Shetty AK; Squirrel M; Bostock J; Rinaldi CA
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21833513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Bostock J; Rosenthal E; Rinaldi CA
Europace; 2011 Jul; 13(7):992-6. PubMed ID: 21343237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.
Forleo GB; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Molfetta AD; Santini L; Romeo F
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20887804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.
Forleo GB; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Mantica M; Parisi Q; Martino A; Pappalardo A; Sergi D; Tesauro M; Papavasileiou LP; Santini L; Calò L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25504267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.
Forleo GB; Mantica M; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Santamaria M; Santangeli P; Avella A; Sergi D; Santini L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
Heart Rhythm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):1822-8. PubMed ID: 22841876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.
Mair H; Sachweh J; Meuris B; Nollert G; Schmoeckel M; Schuetz A; Reichart B; Daebritz S
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 27(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 15691676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research.
Ziacchi M; Zucchelli G; Ricciardi D; Morani G; De Ruvo E; Calzolari V; Viani S; Calabrese V; Tomasi L; Calò L; De Mattia L; Bongiorni MG; Boriani G; Biffi M
Indian Heart J; 2018; 70(6):864-871. PubMed ID: 30580858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute echocardiographic optimization of multiple stimulation configurations of cardiac resynchronization therapy through quadripolar left ventricular pacing: a tailored approach.
Calò L; Martino A; de Ruvo E; Minati M; Fratini S; Rebecchi M; Lanzillo C; Fagagnini A; Borrelli A; De Luca L; Sciarra L
Am Heart J; 2014 Apr; 167(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 24655704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective nonapical left ventricular pacing with quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Forleo GB; Schiavone M; Della Rocca D; Solimene F; Schillaci V; Covino G; Sassara M; Savarese G; Donzelli S; Badolati S; Gerosa C; Lavalle C; Gasperetti A; Mitacchione G; Lovecchio M; Valsecchi S; Santini L
Kardiol Pol; 2021 Apr; 79(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 33750083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy in a Large, Multicenter UK Registry.
Behar JM; Chin HM; Fearn S; Ormerod JO; Gamble J; Foley PW; Bostock J; Claridge S; Jackson T; Sohal M; Antoniadis AP; Razavi R; Betts TR; Herring N; Rinaldi CA
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Feb; 3(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 28280785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead.
Sperzel J; Dänschel W; Gutleben KJ; Kranig W; Mortensen P; Connelly D; Trappe HJ; Seidl K; Duray G; Pieske B; Stockinger J; Boriani G; Jung W; Schilling R; Saberi L; Hallier B; Simon M; Rinaldi CA
Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 21993431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term follow-up of patients with a quadripolar active fixation left ventricular lead: An Italian multicenter experience.
De Regibus V; Biffi M; Infusino T; Savastano S; Landolina M; Palmisano P; Foti R; Facchin D; Dello Russo A; Urraro F; Ziacchi M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 35634866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.
Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Niazi I; Sheppard R; Worley S; Beau S; Greer GS; Aryana A; Cao M; Harbert N; Zhang S;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 23339555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Vado A; Menardi E; Rossetti G; Ballari G; Feola M; Bobbio M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 39(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 24293178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
