BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23573122)

  • 21. A screening test proposal for congenital defects based on maternal serum metabolomics profile.
    Troisi J; Lombardi M; Scala G; Cavallo P; Tayler RS; Symes SJK; Richards SM; Adair DC; Fasano A; McCowan LM; Guida M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 228(3):342.e1-342.e12. PubMed ID: 36075482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Statistical characterization and classification of colon microarray gene expression data using multiple machine learning paradigms.
    Maniruzzaman M; Jahanur Rahman M; Ahammed B; Abedin MM; Suri HS; Biswas M; El-Baz A; Bangeas P; Tsoulfas G; Suri JS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():173-193. PubMed ID: 31200905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods and variable selection methods for predicting difficult-to-measure traits in Holstein dairy cattle using milk infrared spectral data.
    Mota LFM; Pegolo S; Baba T; Peñagaricano F; Morota G; Bittante G; Cecchinato A
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):8107-8121. PubMed ID: 33865589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of Multivariate Classification Models for Analyzing NMR Metabolomics Data.
    Vu T; Siemek P; Bhinderwala F; Xu Y; Powers R
    J Proteome Res; 2019 Sep; 18(9):3282-3294. PubMed ID: 31382745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of subject-independent and subject-specific EEG-based BCI using LDA and SVM classifiers.
    Dos Santos EM; San-Martin R; Fraga FJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Mar; 61(3):835-845. PubMed ID: 36626112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Osteosarcoma Patients Classification Using Plain X-Rays and Metabolomic Data.
    Shen R; Li Z; Zhang L; Hua Y; Mao M; Li Z; Cai Z; Qiu Y; Gryak J; Najarian K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():690-693. PubMed ID: 30440490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
    Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computational advances of tumor marker selection and sample classification in cancer proteomics.
    Tang J; Wang Y; Luo Y; Fu J; Zhang Y; Li Y; Xiao Z; Lou Y; Qiu Y; Zhu F
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2020; 18():2012-2025. PubMed ID: 32802273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Classification for Glioma Grading Using Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Hashido T; Saito S; Ishida T
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):606-613. PubMed ID: 34270479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
    Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combined metabolomics with transcriptomics reveals potential plasma biomarkers correlated with non-small-cell lung cancer proliferation through the Akt pathway.
    Zheng J; Zheng Y; Li W; Zhi J; Huang X; Zhu W; Liu Z; Gong L
    Clin Chim Acta; 2022 May; 530():66-73. PubMed ID: 35245482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of mathematical models in distinguishing ultrasound imaging of breast nodules.
    Li L; Deng H; Ye X; Li Y; Wang J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):16047. PubMed ID: 37749121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Discrimination of raw and processed Dipsacus asperoides by near infrared spectroscopy combined with least squares-support vector machine and random forests.
    Xin N; Gu XF; Wu H; Hu YZ; Yang ZL
    Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2012 Apr; 89():18-24. PubMed ID: 22240232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rapid detection of sunset yellow adulteration in tea powder with variable selection coupled to machine learning tools using spectral data.
    Amsaraj R; Mutturi S
    J Food Sci Technol; 2023 May; 60(5):1530-1540. PubMed ID: 37033304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomarker identification and pathway analysis of rheumatoid arthritis based on metabolomics in combination with ingenuity pathway analysis.
    He Z; Liu Z; Gong L
    Proteomics; 2021 Jun; 21(11-12):e2100037. PubMed ID: 33969925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of missing values substitutes on multivariate analysis of metabolomics data.
    Gromski PS; Xu Y; Kotze HL; Correa E; Ellis DI; Armitage EG; Turner ML; Goodacre R
    Metabolites; 2014 Jun; 4(2):433-52. PubMed ID: 24957035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The application of machine learning to predict genetic relatedness using human mtDNA hypervariable region I sequences.
    Govender P; Fashoto SG; Maharaj L; Adeleke MA; Mbunge E; Olamijuwon J; Akinnuwesi B; Okpeku M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263790. PubMed ID: 35180257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of Cross-Combinations of Feature Selection and Machine-Learning Classification Methods Based on [
    Gómez OV; Herraiz JL; Udías JM; Haug A; Papp L; Cioni D; Neri E
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 35740588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of disease staging and chemotherapeutic response in non-small cell lung cancer from patient tumor-derived metabolomic data.
    Miller HA; Yin X; Smith SA; Hu X; Zhang X; Yan J; Miller DM; van Berkel VH; Frieboes HB
    Lung Cancer; 2021 Jun; 156():20-30. PubMed ID: 33882406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing linear discriminant analysis and supervised learning algorithms for binary classification-A method comparison study.
    Graf R; Zeldovich M; Friedrich S
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200098. PubMed ID: 36529690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.