These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23573645)

  • 1. Interplay of transcriptomics and proteomics.
    Hegde PS; White IR; Debouck C
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jan; 9(2 Suppl):S53-6. PubMed ID: 23573645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay of transcriptomics and proteomics.
    Hegde PS; White IR; Debouck C
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 14(6):647-51. PubMed ID: 14662396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multidimensional protein identification technology: current status and future prospects.
    Kislinger T; Emili A
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2005 Jan; 2(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 15966850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein and small molecule microarrays: powerful tools for high-throughput proteomics.
    Uttamchandani M; Wang J; Yao SQ
    Mol Biosyst; 2006 Jan; 2(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 16880923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic and proteomic profiling for biomarkers and signature profiles of toxicity.
    Merrick BA; Bruno ME
    Curr Opin Mol Ther; 2004 Dec; 6(6):600-7. PubMed ID: 15663324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimized detection of differential expression in global profiling experiments: case studies in clinical transcriptomic and quantitative proteomic datasets.
    Elo LL; Hiissa J; Tuimala J; Kallio A; Korpelainen E; Aittokallio T
    Brief Bioinform; 2009 Sep; 10(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 19549804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linking transcriptomic and proteomic data on the level of protein interaction networks.
    Perco P; Mühlberger I; Mayer G; Oberbauer R; Lukas A; Mayer B
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Jun; 31(11):1780-9. PubMed ID: 20432478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional genomics in a non-model crop: transcriptomics or proteomics?
    Carpentier SC; Coemans B; Podevin N; Laukens K; Witters E; Matsumura H; Terauchi R; Swennen R; Panis B
    Physiol Plant; 2008 Jun; 133(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 18312499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-throughput gene and protein expression analysis in pulp biologic research: review.
    Pääkkönen V; Tjäderhane L
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 20113773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of novel functional differences in monocyte subsets using proteomic and transcriptomic methods.
    Zhao C; Zhang H; Wong WC; Sem X; Han H; Ong SM; Tan YC; Yeap WH; Gan CS; Ng KQ; Koh MB; Kourilsky P; Sze SK; Wong SC
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Aug; 8(8):4028-38. PubMed ID: 19514703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five years later: the current status of the use of proteomics and transcriptomics in EMF research.
    Leszczynski D; de Pomerai D; Koczan D; Stoll D; Franke H; Albar JP
    Proteomics; 2012 Aug; 12(15-16):2493-509. PubMed ID: 22707462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional Genomics meets neurodegenerative disorders Part I: transcriptomic and proteomic technology.
    David DC; Hoerndli F; Götz J
    Prog Neurobiol; 2005 Jun; 76(3):153-68. PubMed ID: 16168556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fungal transcriptomics.
    Bhadauria V; Popescu L; Zhao WS; Peng YL
    Microbiol Res; 2007; 162(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 17707620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An approach to handling and interpretation of ambiguous data in transcriptome and proteome comparisons.
    Irmler M; Hartl D; Schmidt T; Schuchhardt J; Lach C; Meyer HE; Hrabé de Angelis M; Klose J; Beckers J
    Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 18283664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional genomics and proteomics in the clinical neurosciences: data mining and bioinformatics.
    Phan JH; Quo CF; Wang MD
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 158():83-108. PubMed ID: 17027692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for plasma proteomic profiling of cancers.
    Omenn GS
    Proteomics; 2006 Oct; 6(20):5662-73. PubMed ID: 16991194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring glycopeptide-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a combined proteomics and transcriptomics approach for the identification of resistance-related markers.
    Scherl A; François P; Charbonnier Y; Deshusses JM; Koessler T; Huyghe A; Bento M; Stahl-Zeng J; Fischer A; Masselot A; Vaezzadeh A; Gallé F; Renzoni A; Vaudaux P; Lew D; Zimmermann-Ivol CG; Binz PA; Sanchez JC; Hochstrasser DF; Schrenzel J
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Nov; 7():296. PubMed ID: 17121677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proteomes and transcriptomes of the Apicomplexa--where's the message?
    Wastling JM; Xia D; Sohal A; Chaussepied M; Pain A; Langsley G
    Int J Parasitol; 2009 Jan; 39(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 18996390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PageRank-based identification of signaling crosstalk from transcriptomics data: the case of Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Omranian N; Mueller-Roeber B; Nikoloski Z
    Mol Biosyst; 2012 Apr; 8(4):1121-7. PubMed ID: 22327945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel breast cancer biomarkers identified by integrative proteomic and gene expression mapping.
    Ou K; Yu K; Kesuma D; Hooi M; Huang N; Chen W; Lee SY; Goh XP; Tan LK; Liu J; Soon SY; Bin Abdul Rashid S; Putti TC; Jikuya H; Ichikawa T; Nishimura O; Salto-Tellez M; Tan P
    J Proteome Res; 2008 Apr; 7(4):1518-28. PubMed ID: 18318472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.