These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23573791)

  • 1. Causal judgement from information about outcome magnitude.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2268-88. PubMed ID: 23573791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy.
    Mandel DR; Vartanian O
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2388-408. PubMed ID: 19391044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):999-1021. PubMed ID: 16194945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causal judgements about temporal sequences of events in single individuals.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(11):2149-74. PubMed ID: 25728947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causal judgment as evaluation of evidence: the use of confirmation and disconfirmatory information.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):491-513. PubMed ID: 12814099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 11873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human sensitivity to the magnitude and probability of a continuous causal relation in a video game.
    Young ME; Cole JJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 22103694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: effects of relative prevalence of the two causes.
    White P
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):961-91. PubMed ID: 15370512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):977-1007. PubMed ID: 12881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of victim information on causality judgments in a rape trial scenario.
    Rempala DM; Geers AL
    J Soc Psychol; 2009 Aug; 149(4):495-512. PubMed ID: 19702107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.
    Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):157-72. PubMed ID: 19210088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dissociation between causal judgement and the ease with which a cause is categorized with its effect.
    Mitchell CJ; Livesey E; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):400-17. PubMed ID: 17366308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal predictability enhances judgements of causality in elemental causal induction from both observation and intervention.
    Greville WJ; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):678-97. PubMed ID: 25996899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; More P; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgements about the relation between force and trajectory variables in verbally described ballistic projectile motion.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):876-94. PubMed ID: 23075337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.