384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23573806)
1. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction.
Wahabuddin S; Mascarenhas R; Iqbal M; Husain A
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.
Samrit V; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Seith A; Malhotra V
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
Saxena R; Kumar PS; Upadhyay M; Naik V
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage.
Kim S; Herring S; Wang IC; Alcalde R; Mak V; Fu I; Huang G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):189.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18249283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and intermaxillary elastics in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
Koyama I; Iino S; Abe Y; Takano-Yamamoto T; Miyawaki S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 21059875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
Mowafy MI; Zaher AR
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
Jackson A; Lemke R; Hatch J; Salome N; Gakunga P; Cochran D
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical anchorage evaluation of mini-implants treated with sandblasting and acid etching in orthodontics.
Calderón JH; Valencia RM; Casasa AA; Sánchez MA; Espinosa R; Ceja I
Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 21785362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21536211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study.
Wiechmann D; Meyer U; Büchter A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 17348892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molar intrusion with implants using a bite plane appliance: a case report.
Kato S; Kato M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19076182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-implant-supported sliding jig.
Pattabiraman V; Kumari S; Sood R
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 22299112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement.
Hedayati Z; Hashemi SM; Zamiri B; Fattahi HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):588-92. PubMed ID: 17524619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
