296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23574922)
1. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Thorsen K; Søreide JA; Søreide K
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 21():25. PubMed ID: 23574922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Lohsiriwat V; Prapasrivorakul S; Lohsiriwat D
World J Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 18958520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study.
Møller MH; Engebjerg MC; Adamsen S; Bendix J; Thomsen RW
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):655-62. PubMed ID: 22191386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of clinical prediction rules in peptic ulcer perforation: an observational study.
Buck DL; Vester-Andersen M; Møller MH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22126610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models - are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study.
Anbalakan K; Chua D; Pandya GJ; Shelat VG
Int J Surg; 2015 Feb; 14():38-44. PubMed ID: 25560748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems.
Thorsen K; Søreide JA; Søreide K
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Jul; 18(7):1261-8. PubMed ID: 24610235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of PULP score in predicting 30-day perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity, and comparison of its performance with Boey and ASA, a retrospective study.
Saafan T; El Ansari W; Al-Yahri O; Eleter A; Eljohary H; Alfkey R; Hajjar M; Toffaha A; El Osta A
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2019 Jun; 42():23-28. PubMed ID: 31193430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison and validation of scoring systems in a cohort of patients treated for perforated peptic ulcer.
Koç M; Yoldaş O; Kiliç YA; Göçmen E; Ertan T; Dizen H; Tez M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2007 Sep; 392(5):581-5. PubMed ID: 17687581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers.
Koranne A; Byakodi KG; Teggimani V; Kamat VV; Hiregoudar A
Surg J (N Y); 2022 Jul; 8(3):e162-e168. PubMed ID: 35928546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of Boey's score in predicting morbidity and mortality in peptic perforation peritonitis in Northwestern India.
Agarwal A; Jain S; Meena LN; Jain SA; Agarwal L
Trop Gastroenterol; 2015; 36(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 27509704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Risk Scoring Systems to Predict the Outcome in ASA-PS V Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Yurtlu DA; Aksun M; Ayvat P; Karahan N; Koroglu L; Aran GÖ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(13):e3238. PubMed ID: 27043696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strict Selection Criteria During Surgical Training Ensures Good Outcomes in Laparoscopic Omental Patch Repair (LOPR) for Perforated Peptic Ulcer (PPU).
Shelat VG; Ahmed S; Chia CL; Cheah YL
Int Surg; 2015 Feb; 100(2):370-5. PubMed ID: 25692444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.
Søreide K; Thorsen K; Søreide JA
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2015 Feb; 41(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 25621078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential use of peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score as a conversion index of laparoscopic-perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) repair.
Wang YH; Wu YT; Fu CY; Liao CH; Cheng CT; Hsieh CH
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Feb; 48(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 33219825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers.
Lee FY; Leung KL; Lai BS; Ng SS; Dexter S; Lau WY
Arch Surg; 2001 Jan; 136(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 11146785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries.
Mishra A; Sharma D; Raina VK
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2003; 22(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 12696822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of clinical factors and three scoring systems for predicting mortality in perforated peptic ulcer patients, a retrospective study.
Rivai MI; Suchitra A; Janer A
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2021 Sep; 69():102735. PubMed ID: 34466223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary laparoscopic approach to repair perforated peptic ulcer. A retrospective cohort study.
Manco G; Caramaschi S; Rolando G; Malagoli M; Zanelli G; Reggiani Bonetti L; Rossi A
Minerva Chir; 2020 Dec; 75(6):436-441. PubMed ID: 32456394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of Mortality in Patients After Oncologic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Comparison of the ASA, APACHE II, and POSSUM Scoring Systems.
Kisa NG; Kisa E; Cevik BE
Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e13684. PubMed ID: 33833910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of illness severity scoring systems and risk prediction in vascular intensive care admissions.
Dover M; Tawfick W; Hynes N; Sultan S
Vascular; 2016 Aug; 24(4):390-403. PubMed ID: 26482428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
