These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23575461)

  • 1. Real-life efficacy and reliability of training a hearing aid.
    Keidser G; Alamudi K
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):619-29. PubMed ID: 23575461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
    Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.
    Dreschler WA; Keidser G; Convery E; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 18490863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.
    Aldaz G; Puria S; Leifer LJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):732-749. PubMed ID: 27718350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief.
    Shekhawat GS; Searchfield GD; Kobayashi K; Stinear CM
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):617-25. PubMed ID: 23859059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Patient-Centered, Provider-Facilitated Approach to the Refinement of Nonlinear Frequency Compression Parameters Based on Subjective Preference Ratings of Amplified Sound Quality.
    Johnson EE; Light KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):689-702. PubMed ID: 26333877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children.
    Glista D; Scollie S; Sulkers J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1765-87. PubMed ID: 22615475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. User preference and reliability of bilateral hearing aid gain adjustments.
    Hornsby BW; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 18669129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hickson L
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520933392. PubMed ID: 32602407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.