These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23575954)

  • 1. Neural mechanisms of shifts of spatial attention induced by object words with spatial associations: an ERP study.
    Zhang E; Luo J; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhong J; Li Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 227(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 23575954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertical position of Chinese power words influences power judgments: Evidence from spatial compatibility task and event-related Potentials.
    Wu X; Jia H; Wang E; Du C; Wu X; Dang C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Apr; 102():55-61. PubMed ID: 26975719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From top to bottom: spatial shifts of attention caused by linguistic stimuli.
    Dudschig C; Lachmair M; de la Vega I; De Filippis M; Kaup B
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S151-4. PubMed ID: 22806664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention.
    McCarthy G; Nobre AC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 7684969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial cueing in time-space synesthetes: An event-related brain potential study.
    Teuscher U; Brang D; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20637536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mighty metaphors: behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension.
    Zanolie K; Dantzig Sv; Boot I; Wijnen J; Schubert TW; Giessner SR; Pecher D
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Feb; 78(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 22088775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crowded words can be processed semantically: evidence from an ERP study.
    Peng C; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Zhang M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Apr; 88(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 23511445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concreteness of positive word contributions to affective priming: an ERP study.
    Yao Z; Wang Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 24937349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to.
    Rommers J; Meyer AS; Praamstra P; Huettig F
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 23238371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shifting visual attention in space: an electrophysiological analysis using high spatial resolution mapping.
    Hopf JM; Mangun GR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 111(7):1241-57. PubMed ID: 10880800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological correlates of top-down effects facilitating natural image categorization are disrupted by the attenuation of low spatial frequency information.
    Rokszin AA; Győri-Dani D; Nyúl LG; Csifcsák G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Feb; 100():19-27. PubMed ID: 26707649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the processing of affective prosody influenced by spatial attention? An ERP study.
    Gädeke JC; Föcker J; Röder B
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 14():14. PubMed ID: 23360491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the domain-general nature of monitoring in the spatial and verbal cognitive domains.
    Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Arbula S; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():83-95. PubMed ID: 27263124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP evidence of a meaningfulness impact on visual global/local processing: when meaning captures attention.
    Beaucousin V; Cassotti M; Simon G; Pineau A; Kostova M; Houdé O; Poirel N
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1258-1266. PubMed ID: 21281654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: replication and extension.
    Mudrik L; Shalgi S; Lamy D; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():447-58. PubMed ID: 24593900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergence of visual objects involves multiple stages of spatial selection.
    Kasai T; Takeya R; Tanaka S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 25425226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.