These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23576114)

  • 1. Independence is elusive: set size effects on encoding precision in visual search.
    Mazyar H; van den Berg R; Seilheimer RL; Ma WJ
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23576114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: the Frankenbear experiment.
    Alexander RG; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2012 Feb; 54():20-30. PubMed ID: 22227607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does precision decrease with set size?
    Mazyar H; van den Berg R; Ma WJ
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):10. PubMed ID: 22685337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: a signal detection model.
    Santhi N; Reeves A
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1235-56. PubMed ID: 15066389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.
    Wei P; Lü J; Müller HJ; Zhou X
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 17922117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding.
    Williamson K; Scolari M; Jeong S; Kim MS; Awh E
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):15.1-9. PubMed ID: 20053078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Set-size and chromatic uncertainty in an accuracy visual search task.
    Monnier P; Nagy AL
    Vision Res; 2001 Dec; 41(28):3817-27. PubMed ID: 11738449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor ratio influences patterns of eye movements during visual search.
    Shen J; Reingold EM; Pomplun M
    Perception; 2000; 29(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 10820604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural mechanisms of surround attenuation and distractor competition in visual search.
    Boehler CN; Tsotsos JK; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(14):5213-24. PubMed ID: 21471356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the perceptual causes of search set-size effects in complex scenes.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Perception; 2010; 39(6):780-94. PubMed ID: 20698473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic attention lateral asymmetry in visual discrimination tasks.
    Righi LL; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 20559654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity.
    Horstmann G; Ernst D; Becker S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102859. PubMed ID: 31212105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signaling of the strongest stimulus in the owl optic tectum.
    Mysore SP; Asadollahi A; Knudsen EI
    J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(14):5186-96. PubMed ID: 21471353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient visual search for multiple targets among categorical distractors: effects of distractor-distractor similarity across trials.
    Ohkita M; Obayashi Y; Jitsumori M
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():96-105. PubMed ID: 24486515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fur in the midst of the waters: visual search for material type is inefficient.
    Wolfe JM; Myers L
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(9):8. PubMed ID: 20884606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual attention in spatial cueing and visual search.
    Baek J; Dosher BA; Lu ZL
    J Vis; 2021 Mar; 21(3):1. PubMed ID: 33646298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter.
    Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting visual search performance by quantifying stimuli similarities.
    Avraham T; Yeshurun Y; Lindenbaum M
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):9.1-22. PubMed ID: 18484848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.