These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2357677)

  • 1. Reports of case-control studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP; Elmslie TJ
    CMAJ; 1990 Jul; 143(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 2357677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
    Flanagin A
    Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.
    Otwombe KN; Ogutu B
    East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reports of randomized controlled trials: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP; Elmslie TJ
    CMAJ; 1990 Sep; 143(5):381-2. PubMed ID: 2390750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Descriptive studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1989 Nov; 141(9):879-80. PubMed ID: 2804843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case reports: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1989 Sep; 141(5):379-80. PubMed ID: 2766176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication.
    Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 12658257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorials and platform articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1989 Oct; 141(7):666-7. PubMed ID: 2790601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1989 Aug; 141(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 2752346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers.
    Huston P
    CMAJ; 1996 Jun; 154(11):1695-704. PubMed ID: 8646657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PRISMA.
    Blegen MA
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(4):233. PubMed ID: 20585220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publishing in English-language journals.
    Davis AJ; Tschudin V
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistics in biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1990 Feb; 142(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 2302611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of the scientific literature: all that glitters is not gold.
    Diamandis EP
    Clin Biochem; 2006 Dec; 39(12):1109-11. PubMed ID: 17052701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The contribution of reviewers and editors to the scientific work of the authors].
    Pulido M
    Bol Oficina Sanit Panam; 1990 Jan; 108(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 2139568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 119(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12520693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cohort studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP; Elmslie TJ
    CMAJ; 1990 Aug; 143(3):179-80. PubMed ID: 2379125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.