These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23576835)
1. Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Haberl H; Sprinz D; Bonazountas M; Cocco P; Desaubies Y; Henze M; Hertel O; Johnson RK; Kastrup U; Laconte P; Lange E; Novak P; Paavola J; Reenberg A; van den Hove S; Vermeire T; Wadhams P; Searchinger T Energy Policy; 2012 Jun; 45-222(5):18-23. PubMed ID: 23576835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. McKechnie J; Colombo S; Chen J; Mabee W; MacLean HL Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):789-95. PubMed ID: 21142063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Net land-atmosphere flows of biogenic carbon related to bioenergy: towards an understanding of systemic feedbacks. Haberl H Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2013 Jul; 5(4):351-357. PubMed ID: 23956793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Adler PR; Del Grosso SJ; Parton WJ Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):675-91. PubMed ID: 17494388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefit analysis of multi-approach biomass energy utilization toward carbon neutrality. Wang J; Fu J; Zhao Z; Bing L; Xi F; Wang F; Dong J; Wang S; Lin G; Yin Y; Hu Q Innovation (Camb); 2023 May; 4(3):100423. PubMed ID: 37181230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada. Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials. Kang Y; Yang Q; Bartocci P; Wei H; Liu SS; Wu Z; Zhou H; Yang H; Fantozzi F; Chen H Renew Sustain Energy Rev; 2020 Jul; 127():109842. PubMed ID: 34234613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short and long-term carbon balance of bioenergy electricity production fueled by forest treatments. Kelsey KC; Barnes KL; Ryan MG; Neff JC Carbon Balance Manag; 2014; 9():6. PubMed ID: 25187788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent Land Use Change to Agriculture in the U.S. Lake States: Impacts on Cellulosic Biomass Potential and Natural Lands. Mladenoff DJ; Sahajpal R; Johnson CP; Rothstein DE PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148566. PubMed ID: 26866474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cumulative global forest carbon implications of regional bioenergy expansion policies. Kim SJ; Baker JS; Sohngen BL; Shell M Resour Energy Econ; 2018 Aug; 53():198-219. PubMed ID: 30245551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land. Chen L; Blanc-Betes E; Hudiburg TW; Hellerstein D; Wallander S; DeLucia EH; Khanna M Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):1301-1309. PubMed ID: 33410666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use. Whitaker J; Field JL; Bernacchi CJ; Cerri CEP; Ceulemans R; Davies CA; DeLucia EH; Donnison IS; McCalmont JP; Paustian K; Rowe RL; Smith P; Thornley P; McNamara NP Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2018 Mar; 10(3):150-164. PubMed ID: 29497458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aquatic weeds as the next generation feedstock for sustainable bioenergy production. Kaur M; Kumar M; Sachdeva S; Puri SK Bioresour Technol; 2018 Mar; 251():390-402. PubMed ID: 29254877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carbon Abatement and Emissions Associated with the Gasification of Walnut Shells for Bioenergy and Biochar Production. Pujol Pereira EI; Suddick EC; Six J PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150837. PubMed ID: 26963623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database. Schwietzke S; Sherwood OA; Bruhwiler LM; Miller JB; Etiope G; Dlugokencky EJ; Michel SE; Arling VA; Vaughn BH; White JW; Tans PP Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7623):88-91. PubMed ID: 27708291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management. Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Gelfand I; Sahajpal R; Zhang X; Izaurralde RC; Gross KL; Robertson GP Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7433):514-7. PubMed ID: 23334409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioenergy to save the world. Producing novel energy plants for growth on abandoned land. Schröder P; Herzig R; Bojinov B; Ruttens A; Nehnevajova E; Stamatiadis S; Memon A; Vassilev A; Caviezel M; Vangronsveld J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 18504837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Greenhouse gas emissions from building and operating electric power plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Pacca S; Horvath A Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Jul; 36(14):3194-200. PubMed ID: 12141503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The future of bioenergy. Reid WV; Ali MK; Field CB Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Jan; 26(1):274-286. PubMed ID: 31642554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]