185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23577230)
1. Building useful evidence: changing the clinical research paradigm to account for comparative effectiveness research.
Greenfield S; Kaplan SH
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 23577230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.
Carson SS; Goss CH; Patel SR; Anzueto A; Au DH; Elborn S; Gerald JK; Gerald LB; Kahn JM; Malhotra A; Mularski RA; Riekert KA; Rubenfeld GD; Weaver TE; Krishnan JA;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 24160906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
Sox HC
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Building the evidence base for decision making in cancer genomic medicine using comparative effectiveness research.
Goddard KA; Knaus WA; Whitlock E; Lyman GH; Feigelson HS; Schully SD; Ramsey S; Tunis S; Freedman AN; Khoury MJ; Veenstra DL
Genet Med; 2012 Jul; 14(7):633-42. PubMed ID: 22516979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Sports Medicine Research: Identifying Effective Treatment Interventions Through Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Lam KC; Bacon CEW; Sauers EL; Bay RC
J Athl Train; 2020 Mar; 55(3):217-228. PubMed ID: 31618071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
Sox HC; Goodman SN
Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure.
Tunis SR; Benner J; McClellan M
Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1963-76. PubMed ID: 20564311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness research paradigm: implications for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Brouwers MC; Thabane L; Moher D; Straus SE
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4202-7. PubMed ID: 23071227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Armstrong K
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4208-14. PubMed ID: 23071240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
Witt CM
J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of comparative effectiveness research in Asia, Europe, and North America.
Patel I; Rarus R; Tan X; Lee EK; Guy J; Ahmad A; Chang J
Indian J Pharmacol; 2015; 47(6):585-93. PubMed ID: 26729947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consensus of recommendations guiding comparative effectiveness research methods.
Morton JB; McConeghy R; Heinrich K; Gatto NM; Caffrey AR
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 27365094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.
Chalkidou K; Tunis S; Whicher D; Fowler R; Zwarenstein M
Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 22752634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
