These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23577230)

  • 21. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
    Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
    Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The landscape of comparative effectiveness research in rheumatology.
    DeWitt EM; Brunner HI
    Nat Rev Rheumatol; 2014 Jan; 10(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 24061502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
    Fischer MA; Allen-Coleman C; Farrell SF; Schneeweiss S
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26388438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative effectiveness research: what is it and why do we need it in nephrology?
    Chang TI; Winkelmayer WC
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2012 Jun; 27(6):2156-61. PubMed ID: 22649210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
    Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
    Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
    Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence gaps in advanced cancer care: community-based clinicians' perspectives and priorities for CER.
    Lowry SJ; Loggers ET; Bowles EJ; Wagner EH
    Am J Manag Care; 2012 May; 18(5 Spec No. 2):SP77-83. PubMed ID: 22693985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.
    Blajchman MA; Carson JL; Eikelboom JW; Heddle NM; Lacroix J; Lauer MS; Platt R; Tilley B; Triulzi D; Vickers AJ; Yusuf S; Glynn S; Mondoro TH; Wagner E
    Transfusion; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1363-78. PubMed ID: 22486525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Physician Perspectives on Comparative Effectiveness Research: Implications for Practice-based Evidence.
    Pierce BA; Chesney MA; Witt CM; Berman BM
    Glob Adv Health Med; 2012 Sep; 1(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 24278829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative effectiveness research, genomics-enabled personalized medicine, and rapid learning health care: a common bond.
    Ginsburg GS; Kuderer NM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4233-42. PubMed ID: 23071236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):E23-54. PubMed ID: 20119474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of clinical trials in comparative effectiveness research on mental health.
    Blanco C; Rafful C; Olfson M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S29-36. PubMed ID: 23849150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Patient-Centered Approach to Comparative Effectiveness Research Focused on Older Adults: Lessons From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Mason NR; Sox HC; Whitlock EP
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2019 Jan; 67(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 30586155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Respiratory Disease: Promise and Pitfalls.
    Ramos KJ; Somayaji R; Nichols DP; Goss CH
    Paediatr Drugs; 2018 Feb; 20(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28776129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.
    Helfand M; Tunis S; Whitlock EP; Pauker SG; Basu A; Chilingerian J; Harrell FE; Meltzer DO; Montori VM; Shepard DS; Kent DM;
    Clin Transl Sci; 2011 Jun; 4(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 21707950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Oncology comparative effectiveness research: a multistakeholder perspective on principles for conduct and reporting.
    Ramsey SD; Sullivan SD; Reed SD; Tina Shih YC; Schaecher K; Dhanda R; Patt D; Pendergrass K; Walker M; Malin J; Schwartzberg L; Neumann K; Yu E; Ravelo A; Small A
    Oncologist; 2013 Jun; 18(6):760-7. PubMed ID: 23650020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.