618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23577551)
1. A bioactive dental luting cement--its retentive properties and 3-year clinical findings.
Jefferies SR; Pameijer CH; Appleby DC; Boston D; Lööf J
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Feb; 34 Spec No 1():2-9. PubMed ID: 23577551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective observation of a new bioactive luting cement: 2-year follow-up.
Jefferies SR; Pameijer CH; Appleby DC; Boston D; Galbraith C; Lööf J; Glantz PO
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jan; 21(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 22040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of a bioactive dental luting cement--a prospective clinical pilot study.
Jefferies SR; Appleby D; Boston D; Pameijer CH; Lööf J
J Clin Dent; 2009; 20(7):231-7. PubMed ID: 20128321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One year clinical performance and post-operative sensitivity of a bioactive dental luting cement--a prospective clinical study.
Jefferies SR; Pameijer CH; Appleby D; Boston D; Lööf J; Glantz PO
Swed Dent J; 2009; 33(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 20162930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of 209 all-ceramic single crowns cemented on natural and implant-supported abutments with different luting agents: a 6-year retrospective study.
Sorrentino R; Galasso L; Tetè S; De Simone G; Zarone F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 20030675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance of cements as luting agents for telescopic double crown-retained removable partial and complete overdentures.
Behr M; Kolbeck C; Lang R; Hahnel S; Dirschl L; Handel G
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 20095198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of seating force, margin design, and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns.
Piemjai M
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 12066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cement.
Yoneda S; Morigami M; Sugizaki J; Yamada T
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15709497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective study of pulpal response in vital adult teeth prepared for complete coverage restorations at ultrahigh speed using only air coolant.
Lockard MW
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 12473995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.
Nissan J; Narobai D; Gross O; Ghelfan O; Chaushu G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22010095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
Veerabadhran MM; Reddy V; Nayak UA; Rao AP; Sundaram MA
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
