322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23578423)
1. [MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].
Yu QX; Chen XS; Wu JY; Han BS; He JR; Zhu L; Chen WG; Li YF; Tan L; Chai WM; Wang DB; Fei XC; Yuan F; Jin XL; Shen KW; Li HW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23578423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Bieling HB; Wardelmann E; Leutner CC; Koenig R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
Lancet; 2007 Aug; 370(9586):485-92. PubMed ID: 17693177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of MRI on the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Pilewskie M; Kennedy C; Shappell C; Helenowski I; Scholtens D; Hansen N; Bethke K; Jeruss J; Karstaedt P; Khan SA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 May; 20(5):1522-9. PubMed ID: 23224903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.
Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics.
Baur A; Bahrs SD; Speck S; Wietek BM; Krämer B; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Siegmann-Luz KC
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1731-7. PubMed ID: 23743052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Added Value of Breast MRI for Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Diagnostic Performance on 362 Patients.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Petrillo M; Triunfo F; Filice S; Vallone P; Setola SV; Rubulotta M; Di Bonito M; Rinaldo M; D'Aiuto M; Brunetti A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e127-e134. PubMed ID: 28111130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient age and tumor size determine the cancer yield of preoperative bilateral breast MRI in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bae MS; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM; Seo M; Park IA; Han W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 23971464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential role of magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities in ductal carcinoma in situ detection.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Daniel BL
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):345-56, vii. PubMed ID: 11493424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of MRI on the treatment of DCIS.
Chung A; Saouaf R; Scharre K; Phillips E
Am Surg; 2005 Sep; 71(9):705-10. PubMed ID: 16468502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognizing breast ductal carcinoma in situ on fine-needle aspiration: a diagnostic dilemma.
Guo HQ; Zhang ZH; Zhao H; Zhao LL; Pan QJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):710-5. PubMed ID: 23729369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement in DCIS detection rates by MRI over time in a high-risk breast screening study.
Warner E; Causer PA; Wong JW; Wright FC; Jong RA; Hill KA; Messner SJ; Yaffe MJ; Narod SA; Plewes DB
Breast J; 2011; 17(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 21251121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
