BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23579217)

  • 1. Which screening strategy should be offered to women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations? A simulation of comparative cost-effectiveness.
    de Bock GH; Vermeulen KM; Jansen L; Oosterwijk JC; Siesling S; Dorrius MD; Feenstra T; Houssami N; Greuter MJ
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Apr; 108(8):1579-86. PubMed ID: 23579217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
    Cott Chubiz JE; Lee JM; Gilmore ME; Kong CY; Lowry KP; Halpern EF; McMahon PM; Ryan PD; Gazelle GS
    Cancer; 2013 Mar; 119(6):1266-76. PubMed ID: 23184400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
    Pataky R; Armstrong L; Chia S; Coldman AJ; Kim-Sing C; McGillivray B; Scott J; Wilson CM; Peacock S
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23837641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.
    Manchanda R; Patel S; Gordeev VS; Antoniou AC; Smith S; Lee A; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ; Turnbull C; Ramus SJ; Gayther SA; Pharoah PDP; Menon U; Jacobs I; Legood R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Jul; 110(7):714-725. PubMed ID: 29361001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers.
    Grann VR; Patel PR; Jacobson JS; Warner E; Heitjan DF; Ashby-Thompson M; Hershman DL; Neugut AI
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 125(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 20644999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Multigene Test Could Cost-Effectively Help Extend Life Expectancy for Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer.
    Li Y; Arellano AR; Bare LA; Bender RA; Strom CM; Devlin JJ
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 28407996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.
    Griebsch I; Brown J; Boggis C; Dixon A; Dixon M; Easton D; Eeles R; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Hawnaur J; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Potterton J; Thompson D; Turnbull LW; Walker LG; Warren R; Leach MO;
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Oct; 95(7):801-10. PubMed ID: 17016484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Annual screening strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: a comparative effectiveness analysis.
    Lowry KP; Lee JM; Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gilmore ME; Cott Chubiz JE; Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Gazelle GS
    Cancer; 2012 Apr; 118(8):2021-30. PubMed ID: 21935911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
    Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BRCA1 mutation and young age predict fast breast cancer growth in the Dutch, United Kingdom, and Canadian magnetic resonance imaging screening trials.
    Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Obdeijn IM; Hop WC; Causer PA; Leach MO; Warner E; Pointon L; Hill K; Klijn JG; Warren RM; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Dec; 13(24):7357-62. PubMed ID: 18094417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal age to start preventive measures in women with BRCA1/2 mutations or high familial breast cancer risk.
    Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Lingsma HF; Evans DG; Thompson D; Kaas R; Manders P; van Asperen CJ; Adank M; Hooning MJ; Kwan Lim GE; Eeles R; Oosterwijk JC; Leach MO; Steyerberg EW
    Int J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 133(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 23292943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer screening, outside the population-screening program, of women from breast cancer families without proven BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: a simulation study.
    Jacobi CE; Nagelkerke NJ; van Houwelingen JH; de Bock GH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Mar; 15(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 16537697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
    Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study.
    Yeh JM; Lowry KP; Schechter CB; Diller LR; Alagoz O; Armstrong GT; Hampton JM; Leisenring W; Liu Q; Mandelblatt JS; Miglioretti DL; Moskowitz CS; Oeffinger KC; Trentham-Dietz A; Stout NK
    Ann Intern Med; 2020 Sep; 173(5):331-341. PubMed ID: 32628531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of Universal BRCA1/2 Screening: Evidence-Based Decision Making.
    Long EF; Ganz PA
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Dec; 1(9):1217-8. PubMed ID: 26335890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.