These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23579884)

  • 1. Comparative analysis between three methods of bone estimating age in individuals with down syndrome by mode of the hand and wrist ray.
    dos Santos LR; de Melo Castilho JC; Pinto SC; Borges AH; Tonetto MR; Lima DM; Bandéca MC; da Silva MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 23579884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a simplified new method of bone age estimation using three bones of the hand and wrist.
    Khadilkar V; Mondkar S; Desai K; Oza C; Yewale S; Dange N; Lohiya N; Patil P; Prasad HK; Shah N; Karguppikar M; Maheshwari A; Khadilkar A
    Endocrine; 2024 Jun; 84(3):1135-1145. PubMed ID: 38244121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal age estimation for forensic purposes: A comparison of GP, TW2 and TW3 methods on an Italian sample.
    Pinchi V; De Luca F; Ricciardi F; Focardi M; Piredda V; Mazzeo E; Norelli GA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():83-90. PubMed ID: 24681971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal maturation in individuals with Down's syndrome: comparison between PGS curve, cervical vertebrae and bones of the hand and wrist.
    Carinhena G; Siqueira DF; Sannomiya EK
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):58-65. PubMed ID: 25279522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective evaluation of cervical vertebral bone age' its reliability in comparison with hand-wrist bone age: by TW3 method.
    Prasad CK; Reddy VN; Sreedevi G; Ponnada SR; Priya KP; Naik BR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):806-13. PubMed ID: 24685779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation and comparison of dental, skeletal and chronologic age in Bangalore south school going children.
    Shilpa PH; Sunil RS; Sapna K; Kumar NC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2013; 31(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 23886714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Segmenting radiographs of the hand and wrist.
    Manos GK; Cairns AY; Rickets IW; Sinclair D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Jun; 43(3-4):227-37. PubMed ID: 7956164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of skeletal age in multiple epiphyseal dysplasia.
    Park KW; Kim JH; Sung S; Lee MY; Song HR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2014; 34(7):738-42. PubMed ID: 25210941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age estimation methods using hand and wrist radiographs in a group of contemporary Thais.
    Benjavongkulchai S; Pittayapat P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():218.e1-218.e8. PubMed ID: 29685770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal maturation of wrist and hand ossification centers in normal Spanish boys and girls: a study using the Greulich-Pyle method.
    Jiménez-Castellanos J; Carmona A; Catalina-Herrera CJ; Viñuales M
    Acta Anat (Basel); 1996; 155(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 8870789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal age assessment: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Haiter-Neto F; Kurita LM; Menezes AV; Casanova MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):435.e15-20. PubMed ID: 17045139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of the Greulich and Pyle method for chronological age estimation and age majority prediction in a Spanish sample.
    Alcina M; Lucea A; Salicrú M; Turbón D
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jul; 132(4):1139-1149. PubMed ID: 29248958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic bone age assessment based on intelligent algorithms and comparison with TW3 method.
    Liu J; Qi J; Liu Z; Ning Q; Luo X
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Dec; 32(8):678-84. PubMed ID: 18835130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of skeletal maturation by comparing the hand wrist radiograph and cervical vertebrae as seen in lateral cephalogram.
    Mahajan S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 21891905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the ossification of the carpus in skeletal age estimation: Radiographic standards for Australian subadults.
    Reynolds MS; MacGregor DM; Alston-Knox CL; Gregory LS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():e8-e13. PubMed ID: 31196583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability of Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to Indian children.
    Patil ST; Parchand MP; Meshram MM; Kamdi NY
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):200.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22014975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicability of two commonly used bone age assessment methods to twenty-first century UK children.
    Alshamrani K; Offiah AC
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):504-513. PubMed ID: 31372785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone age assessment: Large-scale comparison of Greulich-Pyle method and Tanner-Whitehouse 3 method for Taiwanese children.
    Yuh YS; Chou TY; Tung TH
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Feb; 86(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 36652571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simplified radius, ulna, and short bone-age assessment procedure using grouped-Tanner-Whitehouse method.
    Hsieh CW; Liu TC; Wang JK; Jong TL; Tiu CM
    Pediatr Int; 2011 Aug; 53(4):567-75. PubMed ID: 21486377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new formula for assessing skeletal age in growing infants and children by measuring carpals and epiphyses of radio and ulna.
    De Luca S; Mangiulli T; Merelli V; Conforti F; Velandia Palacio LA; Agostini S; Spinas E; Cameriere R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Apr; 39():109-16. PubMed ID: 26874435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.