433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23579897)
1. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems.
Duque JA; Vivan RR; Cavenago BC; Amoroso-Silva PA; Bernardes RA; Vasconcelos BC; Duarte MA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2017; 25(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 28198973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of WaveOne nickel-titanium instruments.
Saber Sel D; Abu El Sadat SM
J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):685-8. PubMed ID: 23611391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
