These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23579903)

  • 21. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study of shade matching performance of dental students under natural daylight and daylight lamp conditions.
    Mete JJ; Dange SP; Khalikar AN; Vaidya SP
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2013; 8(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 23712340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of factors affecting dental shade matching in first-year dental students.
    Imbery TA; Killough C; Baechle MA; Hankle JL; Janus C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 33637325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master.
    Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Jakstat H; Moldovan O; Schwarz S; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):860-5. PubMed ID: 20633072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of visual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides.
    Oh WS; Koh IW; O'Brien WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2009; 40(10):833-6. PubMed ID: 19898714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color.
    Sinmazisik G; Trakyali G; Tarcin B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25134993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Color perceptibility and validity of silicon carbide-based protective coatings for dental ceramics.
    Fares C; Elhassani R; Ren F; Cabrera AR; Chai I; Neal D; Hsu SM; Esquivel-Upshaw JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):918-924. PubMed ID: 33483139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Implementation of Elaborative Feedback for Qualitative Improvement of Shade Matching-A Randomized Study.
    Olms C; Jakstat HA; Haak R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Sep; 28(5):277-286. PubMed ID: 27534729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of gender and clinical experience on shade perception.
    Aswini KK; Ramanarayanan V; Rejithan A; Sajeev R; Suresh R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Nov; 31(6):608-612. PubMed ID: 31456329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparative study on the shade matching performance of dental students under D55 and D65 light sources conditions].
    Yiqing X; Gang L; Yunhong L; Zhiyun C; Yanan W; Wei L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 36(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 29594999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of Dental Students in Shade Matching: Impact of Training.
    Samra APB; Moro MG; Mazur RF; Vieira S; De Souza EM; Freire A; Rached RN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):E24-E32. PubMed ID: 28371095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.