These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23580025)

  • 1. An evaluation of image descriptors combined with clinical data for breast cancer diagnosis.
    Moura DC; Guevara López MA
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Jul; 8(4):561-74. PubMed ID: 23580025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer CADx based on BI-RAds descriptors from two mammographic views.
    Gupta S; Chyn PF; Markey MK
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1810-7. PubMed ID: 16872088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Needs assessment for next generation computer-aided mammography reference image databases and evaluation studies.
    Horsch A; Hapfelmeier A; Elter M
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Nov; 6(6):749-67. PubMed ID: 21448711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A CADx scheme for mammography empowered with topological information from clustered microcalcifications' atlases.
    Andreadis II; Spyrou GM; Nikita KS
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jan; 19(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 25073178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
    Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
    Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image feature evaluation in two new mammography CAD prototypes.
    Hapfelmeier A; Horsch A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Nov; 6(6):721-35. PubMed ID: 21380554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
    Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the Mann-Whitney statistical test for feature selection: an approach in breast cancer diagnosis on mammography.
    Pérez NP; Guevara López MA; Silva A; Ramos I
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jan; 63(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 25555756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AdaBoost-based multiple SVM-RFE for classification of mammograms in DDSM.
    Yoon S; Kim S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Nov; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 19891795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art.
    Sechopoulos I; Teuwen J; Mann R
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2021 Jul; 72():214-225. PubMed ID: 32531273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast mass segmentation in mammography using plane fitting and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Jiang L; Jin R; Zhang L; Yuan Y; Li Q
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 19362024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.
    Elter M; Horsch A
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2052-68. PubMed ID: 19610294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breast Cadx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE.
    Jamieson AR; Giger ML; Drukker K; Li H; Yuan Y; Bhooshan N
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):339-51. PubMed ID: 20175497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
    Sakai A; Onishi Y; Matsui M; Adachi H; Teramoto A; Saito K; Fujita H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 31686300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of segmentation-free and segmentation-dependent computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses on a public mammography dataset.
    Sawyer Lee R; Dunnmon JA; He A; Tang S; Ré C; Rubin DL
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Jan; 113():103656. PubMed ID: 33309994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
    Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.