These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23580251)

  • 21. Field trial of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for environmental risk assessment in Japan.
    Asanuma Y; Gondo T; Ishigaki G; Inoue K; Zaita N; Muguerza M; Akashi R
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Apr; 8(2):106-116. PubMed ID: 28510512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review.
    Then C; Miyazaki J; Bauer-Panskus A
    Plants (Basel); 2022 Jan; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 35161361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Environmental protection: applying the precautionary principle and proactive regulation to biotechnology.
    Richmond RH
    Trends Biotechnol; 2008 Aug; 26(8):460-7. PubMed ID: 18584904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Environmental risk assessment in GMO analysis.
    Pirondini A; Marmiroli N
    Riv Biol; 2008; 101(2):215-46. PubMed ID: 19048472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Environmental risk assessment in GMO analysis.
    Pirondini A; Marmiroli N
    Riv Biol; 2010; 103(2-3):371-402. PubMed ID: 21384330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risk assessment for release of genetically modified organisms: a virus to reduce the fertility of introduced wild mice, Mus domesticus.
    Williams CK
    Reprod Suppl; 2002; 60():81-8. PubMed ID: 12220167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms.
    Paparini A; Romano-Spica V
    Biotechnol Annu Rev; 2004; 10():85-122. PubMed ID: 15504704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: interaction between the Convention on Biological Diversity and the World Organisation for Animal Health.
    Sendashonga C; Hill R; Petrini A
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 16110874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The current state of GMO governance: are we ready for GM animals?
    Vàzquez-Salat N; Salter B; Smets G; Houdebine LM
    Biotechnol Adv; 2012; 30(6):1336-43. PubMed ID: 22361646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of agribiotechnology and biosafety regulations used to assess safety of genetically modified crops in Bangladesh.
    Nasiruddin KM; Nasim A
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(5):1508-12. PubMed ID: 17956000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. GMOMETHODS: the European Union database of reference methods for GMO analysis.
    Bonfini L; Van den Bulcke MH; Mazzara M; Ben E; Patak A
    J AOAC Int; 2012; 95(6):1713-9. PubMed ID: 23451388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Study of Stakeholder Views to Shape a Communication Strategy for GMO in Brazil.
    Capalbo DM; Arantes OM; Maia AG; Borges IC; da Silveira JM
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():179. PubMed ID: 26618152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Regulation of emerging gene technologies in India.
    Ahuja V
    BMC Proc; 2018; 12(Suppl 8):14. PubMed ID: 30079105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Regulatory and associated political issues with respect to Bt transgenic maize in the European union.
    Saeglitz C; Bartsch D
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2003 Jun; 83(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 12788278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sustainability Council of New Zealand Trust v. The Environmental Protection Authority: Gene editing technologies and the law.
    Kershen DL
    GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 26618752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths.
    Hielscher S; Pies I; Valentinov V; Chatalova L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 27171102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment.
    Hill RA; Sendashonga C
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 15612274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The EU law on genetically modified organisms: the European Commission changes the strategy in order to allow, restrict, or prohibit its culture].
    González Vaqué L
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2010; (33):217-40. PubMed ID: 21510337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of agricultural biotechnology and biosafety regulations used to assess the safety of genetically modified crops in Iran.
    Mousavi A; Malboobi MA; Esmailzadeh NS
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(5):1513-6. PubMed ID: 17956001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strengthening regulatory capacity for gene drives in Africa: leveraging NEPAD's experience in establishing regulatory systems for medicines and GM crops in Africa.
    Glover B; Akinbo O; Savadogo M; Timpo S; Lemgo G; Sinebo W; Akile S; Obukosia S; Ouedraogo J; Ndomondo-Sigonda M; Koch M; Makinde D; Ambali A
    BMC Proc; 2018; 12(Suppl 8):11. PubMed ID: 30079102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.