These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23580251)

  • 61. Genetically modified cotton and farmers' health in China.
    Hossain F; Pray CE; Lu Y; Huang J; Fan C; Hu R
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2004; 10(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 15473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Detection methods for biotech cotton MON 15985 and MON 88913 by PCR.
    Lee SH; Kim JK; Yi BY
    J Agric Food Chem; 2007 May; 55(9):3351-7. PubMed ID: 17402745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy.
    Kumar S; Chandra A; Pandey KC
    J Environ Biol; 2008 Sep; 29(5):641-53. PubMed ID: 19295059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Roads Forward for European GMO Policy-Uncertainties in Wake of ECJ Judgment Have to be Mitigated by Regulatory Reform.
    Wasmer M
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():132. PubMed ID: 31231643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The bioeconomy in Poland within the context of the European Union.
    Woźniak E; Twardowski T
    N Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 40(Pt A):96-102. PubMed ID: 28647548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Labeling of food containing genetically modified organisms: international policies and Brazilian legislation].
    Costa TE; Marin VA
    Cien Saude Colet; 2011 Aug; 16(8):3571-82. PubMed ID: 21860957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Estimates and implications of the costs of compliance with biosafety regulations in developing countries.
    Falck-Zepeda J; Yorobe J; Husin BA; Manalo A; Lokollo E; Ramon G; Zambrano P; Sutrisno
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22614639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Transgenic crops for the agricultural improvement in Pakistan: a perspective of environmental stresses and the current status of genetically modified crops.
    Babar U; Nawaz MA; Arshad U; Azhar MT; Atif RM; Golokhvast KS; Tsatsakis AM; Shcerbakova K; Chung G; Rana IA
    GM Crops Food; 2020; 11(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 31679447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Readiness for Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered (GE) Plants in Uganda.
    Zawedde BM; Kwehangana M; Oloka HK
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2018; 6():152. PubMed ID: 30406096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a case study of the potential of public and private sector data in India and Ethiopia.
    Bhattacharyya S; Berhanu D; Taddesse N; Srivastava A; Wickremasinghe D; Schellenberg J; Iqbal Avan B
    Health Policy Plan; 2016 Sep; 31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii25-ii34. PubMed ID: 27591203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Genetically modified crops: detection strategies and biosafety issues.
    Kamle S; Ali S
    Gene; 2013 Jun; 522(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 23566850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Genetically modified organisms: do the benefits outweigh the risks?
    Hug K
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 18344661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. India blocks sale of transgenic cotton seeds.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6841):983. PubMed ID: 11429564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Transgenic Bt Cotton Does Not Disrupt the Top-Down Forces Regulating the Cotton Aphid in Central China.
    Yao YS; Han P; Niu CY; Dong YC; Gao XW; Cui JJ; Desneux N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166771. PubMed ID: 27870914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Commercial Release of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Interface Between Biosafety Regulatory Systems and Varietal Release Systems.
    Akinbo O; Obukosia S; Ouedraogo J; Sinebo W; Savadogo M; Timpo S; Mbabazi R; Maredia K; Makinde D; Ambali A
    Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():605937. PubMed ID: 33828569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Governance Challenges at the Interface of Food Security and Biodiversity Conservation: A Multi-Level Case Study from Ethiopia.
    Jiren TS; Leventon J; Jager NW; Dorresteijn I; Schultner J; Senbeta F; Bergsten A; Fischer J
    Environ Manage; 2021 Apr; 67(4):717-730. PubMed ID: 33591406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Trends in biotechnology and biosafety in Brazil.
    Mendonça-Hagler L; Souza L; Aleixo L; Oda L
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 19031659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Predators and the public trust.
    Treves A; Chapron G; López-Bao JV; Shoemaker C; Goeckner AR; Bruskotter JT
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):248-270. PubMed ID: 26526656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Collateral biodiversity benefits associated with 'free-market' approaches to sustainable land use and forestry activities.
    Koziell I; Swingland IR
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1807-16. PubMed ID: 12460499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Synergies between veterinarians and para-professionals in the public and private sectors: organisational and institutional relationships that facilitate the process of privatising animal health services in developing countries.
    Woodford JD
    Rev Sci Tech; 2004 Apr; 23(1):115-35; discussion 391-401. PubMed ID: 15200091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.