936 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23580629)
1. Changes in dynamic plantar pressure during loaded gait.
Goffar SL; Reber RJ; Christiansen BC; Miller RB; Naylor JA; Rodriguez BM; Walker MJ; Teyhen DS
Phys Ther; 2013 Sep; 93(9):1175-84. PubMed ID: 23580629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model.
Levinger P; Murley GS; Barton CJ; Cotchett MP; McSweeney SR; Menz HB
Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 20696579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running.
Chuckpaiwong B; Nunley JA; Mall NA; Queen RM
Gait Posture; 2008 Oct; 28(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 18337103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait.
Teyhen DS; Stoltenberg BE; Collinsworth KM; Giesel CL; Williams DG; Kardouni CH; Molloy JM; Goffar SL; Christie DS; McPoil T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 19246138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of running shoe type on the distribution and magnitude of plantar pressures in individuals with low- or high-arched feet.
Molloy JM; Christie DS; Teyhen DS; Yeykal NS; Tragord BS; Neal MS; Nelson ES; McPoil T
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2009; 99(4):330-8. PubMed ID: 19605927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking.
Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks.
Queen RM; Mall NA; Nunley JA; Chuckpaiwong B
Gait Posture; 2009 Jun; 29(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 19157878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The association between high-arched feet, plantar pressure distribution and body posture in young women.
Woźniacka R; Oleksy Ł; Jankowicz-Szymańska A; Mika A; Kielnar R; Stolarczyk A
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17187. PubMed ID: 31748559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the Heidelberg foot measurement method.
Twomey D; McIntosh AS; Simon J; Lowe K; Wolf SI
Gait Posture; 2010 May; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20172730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Custom therapeutic insoles based on both foot shape and plantar pressure measurement provide enhanced pressure relief.
Owings TM; Woerner JL; Frampton JD; Cavanagh PR; Botek G
Diabetes Care; 2008 May; 31(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 18252899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet.
Buldt AK; Forghany S; Landorf KB; Levinger P; Murley GS; Menz HB
Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():235-240. PubMed ID: 29573666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of gait cadence on the ground reaction forces and plantar pressures during load carriage of young adults.
Castro MP; Figueiredo MC; Abreu S; Sousa H; Machado L; Santos R; Vilas-Boas JP
Appl Ergon; 2015 Jul; 49():41-6. PubMed ID: 25766421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of foot arch on plantar pressure distribution during standing.
Periyasamy R; Anand S
J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Jul; 37(5):342-7. PubMed ID: 23795697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of cleat types during two football-specific tasks on FieldTurf.
Queen RM; Charnock BL; Garrett WE; Hardaker WM; Sims EL; Moorman CT
Br J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 42(4):278-84; discussion 284. PubMed ID: 17717058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of the posterior tibial tendon on the medial arch of the foot: an in vitro kinetic and kinematic study].
Emmerich J; Wülker N; Hurschler C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2003 Apr; 48(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 12749288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are in-shoe pressure characteristics in symptomatic idiopathic pes cavus related to the location of foot pain?
Crosbie J; Burns J
Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 17254789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of foot with different foot arch heights: a finite element analysis.
Sun PC; Shih SL; Chen YL; Hsu YC; Yang RC; Chen CS
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 21614705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plantar pressure distribution analysis in normal weight young women and men with normal and claw feet: a cross-sectional study.
Gravante G; Pomara F; Russo G; Amato G; Cappello F; Ridola C
Clin Anat; 2005 May; 18(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 15832349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the Foot Posture Index or their individual criteria predict dynamic plantar pressures?
Sánchez-Rodríguez R; Martínez-Nova A; Escamilla-Martínez E; Pedrera-Zamorano JD
Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 22727718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-response effects of forefoot and arch orthotic components on the center of pressure trajectory during running in pronated feet.
Zhang X; Lam WK; Vanwanseele B
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():212-217. PubMed ID: 34864487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
