These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23581147)

  • 1. Experimental design: computer simulation for improving the precision of an experiment.
    van Wilgenburg H; Zillesen PG; Krulichova I
    Altern Lab Anim; 2004 Jun; 32 Suppl 1B():607-11. PubMed ID: 23581147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample Power and ExpDesign: tools for improving design of animal experiments.
    van Wilgenburg H; van Schaick Zillesen PG; Krulichova I
    Lab Anim (NY); 2003 Mar; 32(3):39-43. PubMed ID: 12601388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals.
    Festing MF; Altman DG
    ILAR J; 2002; 43(4):244-58. PubMed ID: 12391400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The scope for improving the design of laboratory animal experiments.
    Festing MF
    Lab Anim; 1992 Oct; 26(4):256-68. PubMed ID: 1447904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power to the People: Power, Negative Results and Sample Size.
    Gaskill BN; Garner JP
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 59(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 31852563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Formal sample size calculation and its limited validity in animal studies of medical basic research].
    Mayer B; Muche R
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2013; 41(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 24326876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing sample size in experiments with animals: historical controls and related strategies.
    Kramer M; Font E
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):431-445. PubMed ID: 26565143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical aspects of experimental design in animal research.
    Johnson PD; Besselsen DG
    ILAR J; 2002; 43(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 12391395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of factorial designs to optimize animal experiments and reduce animal use.
    Shaw R; Festing MF; Peers I; Furlong L
    ILAR J; 2002; 43(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 12391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size.
    Lazic SE
    Lab Anim; 2018 Dec; 52(6):621-629. PubMed ID: 29629616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal designs for estimating and testing interaction among multiple loci in complex traits by a Gibbs sampler.
    Lee C; Kim Y
    Genomics; 2008 Dec; 92(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 18786631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental design, power and sample size for animal reproduction experiments.
    Chapman PL; Seidel GE
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2008; 20(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18154696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of a factorial design focusing on inclusion of female and male animals in one experiment.
    Buch T; Moos K; Ferreira FM; Fröhlich H; Gebhard C; Tresch A
    J Mol Med (Berl); 2019 Jun; 97(6):871-877. PubMed ID: 30980104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ML-DEs: a program for designing efficient multilevel studies.
    Cools W; Van den Noortgate W; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):236-49. PubMed ID: 18411547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On determining sample size in experiments involving laboratory animals.
    Festing MF
    Lab Anim; 2018 Aug; 52(4):341-350. PubMed ID: 29310487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli.
    Westfall J; Kenny DA; Judd CM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):2020-45. PubMed ID: 25111580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selecting the best design for nonstandard toxicology experiments.
    Webb JM; Smucker BJ; Bailer AJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Oct; 33(10):2399-406. PubMed ID: 24943385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finding Alternatives to the Dogma of Power Based Sample Size Calculation: Is a Fixed Sample Size Prospective Meta-Experiment a Potential Alternative?
    Tavernier E; Trinquart L; Giraudeau B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158604. PubMed ID: 27362939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.