These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23581163)

  • 1. Report of the workshop on the validation of QSARs and other computational prediction models.
    Worth AP; Cronin MT
    Altern Lab Anim; 2004 Jun; 32 Suppl 1B():703-6. PubMed ID: 23581163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the applicability of (Q)SARs for percutaneous penetration in regulatory risk assessment.
    Bouwman T; Cronin MT; Bessems JG; van de Sandt JJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 27(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 18684796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The current status and future applicability of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in predicting toxicity.
    Cronin MT
    Altern Lab Anim; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():81-4. PubMed ID: 12513655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical considerations on the use of predictive models for regulatory purposes.
    Tunkel J; Mayo K; Austin C; Hickerson A; Howard P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(7):2188-99. PubMed ID: 15871254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of a quantitative structure-activity relationship for chronic narcosis to fish.
    Claeys L; Iaccino F; Janssen CR; Van Sprang P; Verdonck F
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Oct; 32(10):2217-25. PubMed ID: 23775559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ecotoxicity prediction using mechanism- and non-mechanism-based QSARs: a preliminary study.
    Ren S
    Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(9):1053-65. PubMed ID: 14512109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring QSARs with Extended Topochemical Atom (ETA) indices for modeling chemical and drug toxicity.
    Roy K; Ghosh G
    Curr Pharm Des; 2010; 16(24):2625-39. PubMed ID: 20642426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ECVAM's activities on computer modelling and integrated testing.
    Worth AP
    Altern Lab Anim; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():133-7. PubMed ID: 12513665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints.
    Jaworska JS; Comber M; Auer C; Van Leeuwen CJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1358-60. PubMed ID: 12896859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs) and machine learning models for abiotic reduction of organic compounds by an aqueous Fe(II) complex.
    Gao Y; Zhong S; Torralba-Sanchez TL; Tratnyek PG; Weber EJ; Chen Y; Zhang H
    Water Res; 2021 Mar; 192():116843. PubMed ID: 33494041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of the international workshops on quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in environmental toxicology.
    Kaiser KL
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):3-20. PubMed ID: 17365955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Essential and desirable characteristics of ecotoxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Schultz TW; Cronin MT
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Mar; 22(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 12627648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the QSAR's predictive truthfulness of the novel N-tuple discrete derivative indices on benchmark datasets.
    Martínez-Santiago O; Marrero-Ponce Y; Vivas-Reyes R; Rivera-Borroto OM; Hurtado E; Treto-Suarez MA; Ramos Y; Vergara-Murillo F; Orozco-Ugarriza ME; Martínez-López Y
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 May; 28(5):367-389. PubMed ID: 28590848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the transformation of organic micropollutants during oxidative water treatment.
    Lee Y; von Gunten U
    Water Res; 2012 Dec; 46(19):6177-95. PubMed ID: 22939392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs.
    Eriksson L; Jaworska J; Worth AP; Cronin MT; McDowell RM; Gramatica P
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1361-75. PubMed ID: 12896860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of "fitness-for-purpose" of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict (eco-)toxicological endpoints for regulatory use.
    Belfield SJ; Enoch SJ; Firman JW; Madden JC; Schultz TW; Cronin MTD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104956. PubMed ID: 33979632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification and description of the uncertainty, variability, bias and influence in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity prediction.
    Cronin MTD; Richarz AN; Schultz TW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Aug; 106():90-104. PubMed ID: 31026540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment and Reproducibility of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models by the Nonexpert.
    Patel M; Chilton ML; Sartini A; Gibson L; Barber C; Covey-Crump L; Przybylak KR; Cronin MTD; Madden JC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Mar; 58(3):673-682. PubMed ID: 29425037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of local and consensus quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for the prediction of bioconcentration factor.
    Piir G; Sild S; Maran U
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(3):175-99. PubMed ID: 23410132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of QSARs and VFARs to the rapid risk assessment process at US EPA.
    Moudgal CJ; Young D; Nichols T; Martin T; Harten P; Venkatapathy R; Stelma G; Siddhanti S; Baier-Anderson C; Wolfe M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(5-6):579-87. PubMed ID: 18853303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.