305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23581489)
1. Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term.
Baud D; Rouiller S; Hohlfeld P; Tolsa JF; Vial Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Nov; 26(16):1595-601. PubMed ID: 23581489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.
Karlström A; Lindgren H; Hildingsson I
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):479-86; discussion 486. PubMed ID: 23316937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
Dunne C; Da Silva O; Schmidt G; Natale R
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20085677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?
Okby R; Shoham-Vardi I; Ruslan S; Sheiner E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Dec; 26(18):1804-6. PubMed ID: 23662640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
Glantz JC
J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following induction of labor: a cohort study.
Grivell RM; Reilly AJ; Oakey H; Chan A; Dodd JM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 21995778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate neonatal outcomes after elective induction of labor.
Beebe L; Beaty C; Rayburn W
J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 17465284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor.
Vardo JH; Thornburg LL; Glantz JC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 21366123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after Caesarean delivery: a population-based study.
Litwin CE; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Zakhari A; Abenhaim HA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Aug; 31(16):2148-2154. PubMed ID: 28573941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes in uncomplicated term nulliparous after different routes of delivery].
Qi H; Bian XM; Yang JQ; Liu JT; Gong XM; Teng LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 42(12):818-21. PubMed ID: 18476514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends and outcomes of induction of labour among nullipara at term.
Patterson JA; Roberts CL; Ford JB; Morris JM
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Dec; 51(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
