These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23581489)

  • 1. Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term.
    Baud D; Rouiller S; Hohlfeld P; Tolsa JF; Vial Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Nov; 26(16):1595-601. PubMed ID: 23581489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
    Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.
    Karlström A; Lindgren H; Hildingsson I
    BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):479-86; discussion 486. PubMed ID: 23316937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
    Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
    Dunne C; Da Silva O; Schmidt G; Natale R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20085677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?
    Okby R; Shoham-Vardi I; Ruslan S; Sheiner E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Dec; 26(18):1804-6. PubMed ID: 23662640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
    Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following induction of labor: a cohort study.
    Grivell RM; Reilly AJ; Oakey H; Chan A; Dodd JM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 21995778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate neonatal outcomes after elective induction of labor.
    Beebe L; Beaty C; Rayburn W
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 17465284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor.
    Vardo JH; Thornburg LL; Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 21366123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after Caesarean delivery: a population-based study.
    Litwin CE; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Zakhari A; Abenhaim HA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Aug; 31(16):2148-2154. PubMed ID: 28573941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
    Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes in uncomplicated term nulliparous after different routes of delivery].
    Qi H; Bian XM; Yang JQ; Liu JT; Gong XM; Teng LR
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 42(12):818-21. PubMed ID: 18476514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends and outcomes of induction of labour among nullipara at term.
    Patterson JA; Roberts CL; Ford JB; Morris JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Dec; 51(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21806594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.