BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23581662)

  • 1. Is there a human right to private health care?
    Gross A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 23581662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canada's Supreme Court invites privatization.
    Fuller C
    Revolution (Oakl); 2005; 6(3):13. PubMed ID: 16092477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Just Medicare: the role of Canadian courts in determining health care rights and access.
    Flood CM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 16686238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal rights, constitutional controversies, and access to health care: lessons from Canada.
    Ries NM
    Med Law; 2006 Mar; 25(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 16681113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joe public v. the general public: the role of the courts in Israeli health care policy.
    Shalev C; Chinitz D
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16686236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Private health insurance: an international overview and considerations for Canada.
    Dhalla I
    Healthc Q; 2007; 10(4):89-96. PubMed ID: 18274001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The right to health care services under Quebec law].
    Sprumont D
    Health Law J; 1998; 6 Spec No():189-238. PubMed ID: 14746067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A neo-institutional analysis of the hidden interaction between the Israeli Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance: the right to healthcare services.
    Sperling D; Cohen N
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2018 Nov; 7(1):71. PubMed ID: 30482250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Access to service: threats and opportunities/the role of the private sector in Alberta's new health system.
    Feehan KP
    Health Law Can; 1995 Aug; 16(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 10170064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health care rights in Canada: the Chaoulli legacy.
    Flood CM; Xavier S
    Med Law; 2008 Sep; 27(3):617-44. PubMed ID: 19004386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Litigation and the right to health in Argentina].
    Gotlieb V; Yavich N; Báscolo E
    Cad Saude Publica; 2016 Jan; 32(1):. PubMed ID: 26886369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The illegality of private health care in Canada.
    Flood CM; Archibald T
    CMAJ; 2001 Mar; 164(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 11276552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supreme disagreement: the highest court affirms an empty right.
    Flood CM; Sullivan T
    CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15967947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rights to specialized health care in Norway: a normative perspective.
    Norheim OF
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):641-9. PubMed ID: 16686235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary: The Consequences of Private Involvement in Healthcare - The Australian Experience.
    Duckett S
    Healthc Policy; 2020 May; 15(4):21-25. PubMed ID: 32538345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Private health care in Canada.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1661-4. PubMed ID: 16625005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Circles of exclusion: obstacles in access to health care services in Israel.
    Filc D
    Int J Health Serv; 2010; 40(4):699-717. PubMed ID: 21058539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The right to health. Constitutional dimensions].
    Pestalozza C
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Sep; 50(9):1113-8. PubMed ID: 17828472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health rights litigation and access to medicines: priority classification of successful cases from Costa Rica's constitutional chamber of the Supreme Court.
    Norheim OF; Wilson BM
    Health Hum Rights; 2014 Dec; 16(2):E47-61. PubMed ID: 25569724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The government responds to the Chaoulli/Zeliotis judgment, easing open the door to privatization.
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(5 Suppl):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16776035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.