140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2358181)
1. [Progress in the early detection of cervix cancer from the viewpoint of the Saarland cancer register].
Brenner H; Wiebelt H; Ziegler H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Apr; 50(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 2358181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Lymphomas and leukemias in population-related cancer registries in Germany].
Lehnert M; Baumgardt-Elms C; Stegmaier C; Liese A; Krieg V; Mattauch V; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 1999 Apr; 61(4):161-7. PubMed ID: 10408142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Incidence of secondary tumors following cervical neoplasia in Saarland 1968-1987].
Brenner H; Stegmaier C; Ziegler H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Aug; 50(8):614-8. PubMed ID: 2210308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer in New Zealand: national and regional trends.
Cox B; Borman B
N Z Med J; 1994 Aug; 107(984):323-6. PubMed ID: 8072727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Descriptive epidemiology and prognosis of malignant gynecologic tumors].
Kolles H; Stegmaier C; von Seebach HB; Ziegler H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Jun; 49(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 2787260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linear trend analysis of patients with cervical cancer treated at the Institute of Oncology Vojvodina in 2001-2007.
Nincic D; Mandic A; Dugandzija T; Zivaljevic M; Rajovic J; Vojinovic D
J BUON; 2009; 14(4):669-72. PubMed ID: 20148460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Screening for cervical cancer in East Germany--a progress report].
Ebeling K; Nischan P
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1986; 80(7):278-305. PubMed ID: 3487887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Organization and results of cervical cancer screening in the German Democratic Republic.
Ebeling K; Nischan P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):251-66. PubMed ID: 3570410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Downstaging of cervical cancer.
Ananth R
J Indian Med Assoc; 2000 Feb; 98(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 11016148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prophylactic cytological investigation for cervical cancer in relation to stage at diagnosis: a study of 420 women in Denmark.
Olesen F
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Aug; 38(313):356-9. PubMed ID: 3256647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of age on cervical cancer survival in Japan.
Ioka A; Tsukuma H; Ajiki W; Oshima A
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 35(8):464-9. PubMed ID: 16006573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening and the older woman: obstacles and opportunities.
Brooks SE
Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8826140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
