137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2358189)
1. Replicate differences in lines of mice selected for body composition.
Eisen EJ; Pomp D
Genome; 1990 Apr; 33(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 2358189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlated responses in body composition based on selection for different indicator traits in mice.
Eisen EJ; Coffey MT
J Anim Sci; 1990 Nov; 68(11):3557-62. PubMed ID: 2262408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Partitioning average and heterotic components of direct and maternal genetic effects on growth in mice using crossfostering techniques.
Nagai J; Bakker H; Eisen EJ
Genetics; 1976 Sep; 84(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 992361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive performance in a diallel cross among lines of mice selected for litter size and body weight.
Hörstgen-Schwark G; Eisen EJ; Saxton AM; Bandy TR
J Anim Sci; 1984 Apr; 58(4):846-62. PubMed ID: 6539325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlated responses in development and distribution of fat depots in mice selected for body composition traits.
Prasetyo H; Eisen EJ
Theor Appl Genet; 1989 Aug; 78(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 24227147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimates of genetic parameters and predicted selection responses for growth, fat and lean traits in mice.
Eisen EJ; Prasetyo H
J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1153-65. PubMed ID: 3397343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heterosis, maternal and direct effects in double-muscled and normal cattle: II. Carcass traits of young bulls.
Arthur PF; Makarechian M; Price MA; Berg RT
J Anim Sci; 1989 Apr; 67(4):911-9. PubMed ID: 2715118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic architecture of carcass composition in chickens.
Barbato GF
Poult Sci; 1992 May; 71(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 1608873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heterosis among closed lines of Hereford cattle. III. Postweaning growth and carcass traits in steers.
Anderson DC; Kress DD; Burfening PJ; Blackwell RL
J Anim Sci; 1986 Apr; 62(4):950-7. PubMed ID: 3710936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
Bereskin B
J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additive and nonadditive differences in postweaning growth and carcass characteristics of Devon, Hereford, and reciprocal-cross steers.
Johnston DJ; Thompson JM; Hammond K
J Anim Sci; 1992 Sep; 70(9):2688-94. PubMed ID: 1399883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heterosis following long-term bidirectional selection for mating frequency in male Japanese quail.
Yang N; Dunnington EA; Siegel PB
Poult Sci; 1999 Sep; 78(9):1252-6. PubMed ID: 10515353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkey lines. 2. Carcass traits and body shape.
Nestor KE; Anderson JW; Velleman SG
Poult Sci; 2001 Aug; 80(8):1093-104. PubMed ID: 11495460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Growth related traits in body weight selected lines and their crosses reared under different nutritional regimens.
Liu G; Dunnington EA; Siegel PB
Br Poult Sci; 1995 May; 36(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 7655897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal heterosis and grandmaternal effects in beef cattle: postweaning growth and carcass traits.
Gregory KE; Dearborn DD; Cundiff LV; Koch RM
J Anim Sci; 1987 Nov; 65(5):1180-94. PubMed ID: 3693145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive performance in mice selected for divergence in body fat content.
Armbrust TA; Eisen EJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 1994 Jan; 111(1-6):27-34. PubMed ID: 21395749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection for components related to body composition in mice: direct responses.
Eisen EJ
Theor Appl Genet; 1987 Oct; 74(6):793-801. PubMed ID: 24240342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic response to selection for weaning weight or yearling weight or yearling weight and muscle score in Hereford cattle: efficiency of gain, growth, and carcass characteristics.
Koch RM; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Van Vleck LD
J Anim Sci; 2004 Mar; 82(3):668-82. PubMed ID: 15032423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic and maternal effects on pig weights, growth and probe backfat in diallel crosses of high- and low-fat lines of swine.
Bereskin B; Hetzer HO
J Anim Sci; 1986 Aug; 63(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 3759676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Heterosis retained in advanced generations of crosses among Angus and Hereford cattle.
Koch RM; Dickerson GE; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE
J Anim Sci; 1985 May; 60(5):1117-32. PubMed ID: 4008360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
