These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23583214)

  • 1. Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: cost-based decision analysis.
    Hirshfeld-Cytron J; Winter J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 209(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23583214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF?
    Boeckxstaens A; Devroey P; Collins J; Tournaye H
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2660-4. PubMed ID: 17670765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unilateral laparoscopic tubal reversal versus IVF.
    Çetin C; Cetin MT; Ürünsak İF
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Sep; 23(9):771-4. PubMed ID: 24001156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation.
    Messinger LB; Alford CE; Csokmay JM; Henne MB; Mumford SL; Segars JH; Armstrong AY
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):32-8.e4. PubMed ID: 26006734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Tubal Re-anastomosis or In Vitro Fertilisation in Previously Ligated Patients: A Comparison of Fertility Outcomes and Survey of Patient Attitudes.
    Chua KH; Chan JKY; Liu S; Tan TY; Phoon JWL; Viardot-Foucault VC; Nadarajah S; Tan HH
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2020 Apr; 49(4):180-185. PubMed ID: 32296806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.
    Fernandez H; Legendre G; Blein C; Lamarsalle L; Panel P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 24993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
    Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Caillet M; Vandromme J; Rozenberg S; Paesmans M; Germay O; Degueldre M
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1844-7. PubMed ID: 20004380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of tubal patency tests.
    Verhoeve HR; Moolenaar LM; Hompes P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    BJOG; 2013 Apr; 120(5):583-93. PubMed ID: 23331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sterilization.
    Newton JR
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Dec; 11(3):603-40. PubMed ID: 6239731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Psychosocial prognostic factors for refertilization or IvF after tubal sterilization].
    Langer M; Schreiner-Frech I; Nemeskeri N; Hick P; Ringler M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Mar; 55(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 7665059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted tubo-tubal reanastomosis after sterilization in 10 steps.
    Netter A; Litaudon C; Tourette C; Miquel L; Courbiere B; Agostini A
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 52(6):102605. PubMed ID: 37210010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tips and Techniques for Laparoscopic Tubal Reanastomosis: A Case Report.
    Sato K; Nishijima Y; Tabe K; Sagara Y; Kashiwagi H; Izumi SI; Ishimoto H
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 46(3):137-141. PubMed ID: 34498250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional Laparoscopy Is the Better Option for Tubal Sterilization Reversal: A Closer Look at Tubal Reanastomosis.
    Madison A; Alamri L; Schwartz A; Brolinson M; DeCherney A
    Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle); 2021; 2(1):375-380. PubMed ID: 34671757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre.
    Karayalcin R; Ozcan S; Tokmak A; Gürlek B; Yenicesu O; Timur H
    J Int Med Res; 2017 Jun; 45(3):1245-1252. PubMed ID: 28534697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychological sequelae of surgical reversal or of IVF after tubal ligation.
    Langer M; Hick P; Nemeskeri N; Schneider B; Ringlerl M
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 8485611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility.
    Pashayan N; Lyratzopoulos G; Mathur R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jun; 6():80. PubMed ID: 16796733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives.
    Little SE; Ratcliffe J; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601. PubMed ID: 16946220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microsurgical anastomosis of the fallopian tubes after tubal ligation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sastre J; Mínguez JÁ; Alcázar JL; Chiva L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():168-177. PubMed ID: 38353086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro fertilization (IVF) versus gonadotropins followed by IVF as treatment for primary infertility: a cost-based decision analysis.
    Kansal-Kalra S; Milad MP; Grobman WA
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):600-4. PubMed ID: 16169391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.