209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23583618)
1. Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Lendvay TS; Brand TC; White L; Kowalewski T; Jonnadula S; Mercer LD; Khorsand D; Andros J; Hannaford B; Satava RM
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jun; 216(6):1181-92. PubMed ID: 23583618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual Reality Warm-up Before Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kelly JD; Kowalewski TM; Brand T; French A; Nash M; Meryman L; Heller N; Organ N; George E; Smith R; Sorensen MD; Comstock B; Lendvay TS
J Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 264():107-116. PubMed ID: 33799119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual reality training improves da Vinci performance: a prospective trial.
Cho JS; Hahn KY; Kwak JM; Kim J; Baek SJ; Shin JW; Kim SH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Dec; 23(12):992-8. PubMed ID: 24138400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum.
Bric J; Connolly M; Kastenmeier A; Goldblatt M; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3343-8. PubMed ID: 24946742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.
Bric JD; Lumbard DC; Frelich MJ; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2169-78. PubMed ID: 26304107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum.
Connolly M; Seligman J; Kastenmeier A; Goldblatt M; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2014 May; 28(5):1691-4. PubMed ID: 24380993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial.
Palter VN; Grantcharov TP
Ann Surg; 2014 Mar; 259(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 24503910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pilot study of surgical training using a virtual robotic surgery simulator.
Tergas AI; Sheth SB; Green IC; Giuntoli RL; Winder AD; Fader AN
JSLS; 2013; 17(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 23925015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study.
Van Sickle KR; Ritter EM; McClusky DA; Lederman A; Baghai M; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jan; 21(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17111280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents.
Radi I; Tellez JC; Alterio RE; Scott DJ; Sankaranarayanan G; Nagaraj MB; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Polanco PM
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7279-7287. PubMed ID: 35194662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender differences in the acquisition of suturing skills with the da Vinci surgical system.
Chiu HY; Kang YN; Wang WL; Tong YS; Chang SW; Fong TH; Wei PL
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Jan; 119(1 Pt 3):462-470. PubMed ID: 31300325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-phase training on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance in tele-robotic surgery.
Balasundaram I; Aggarwal R; Darzi A
Int J Med Robot; 2008 Jun; 4(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 18327876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two simulation systems to support robotic-assisted surgical training: a pilot study (Swine model).
Whitehurst SV; Lockrow EG; Lendvay TS; Propst AM; Dunlow SG; Rosemeyer CJ; Gobern JM; White LW; Skinner A; Buller JL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 25543068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator.
Lyons C; Goldfarb D; Jones SL; Badhiwala N; Miles B; Link R; Dunkin BJ
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):2020-30. PubMed ID: 23389060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of validity evidence for the RobotiX robot assisted surgery simulator on advanced suturing tasks.
Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI
BMC Surg; 2020 Aug; 20(1):183. PubMed ID: 32787831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker.
Tausch TJ; Kowalewski TM; White LW; McDonough PS; Brand TC; Lendvay TS
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):919-23. PubMed ID: 22819403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study on the learning curve of the robotic virtual reality simulator.
Kang SG; Yang KS; Ko YH; Kang SH; Park HS; Lee JG; Kim JJ; Cheon J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Jun; 22(5):438-42. PubMed ID: 22401588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
