BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23583618)

  • 21. Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool?
    Lee JY; Mucksavage P; Kerbl DC; Huynh VB; Etafy M; McDougall EM
    J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):998-1002. PubMed ID: 22264455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The SEP "robot": a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the Da Vinci Surgical System?
    van der Meijden OA; Broeders IA; Schijven MP
    Surg Technol Int; 2010 Apr; 19():51-8. PubMed ID: 20437345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.
    Stefanidis D; Wang F; Korndorffer JR; Dunne JB; Scott DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 19536599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in the assessment of basic robotic surgical skills.
    Gorard J; Boal M; Swamynathan V; Ghamrawi W; Francis N
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jan; 38(1):116-128. PubMed ID: 37932602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic virtual reality simulation plus standard robotic orientation versus standard robotic orientation alone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Vaccaro CM; Crisp CC; Fellner AN; Jackson C; Kleeman SD; Pavelka J
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2013; 19(5):266-70. PubMed ID: 23982574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of 2 ex vivo training curricula for advanced laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled trial.
    Orzech N; Palter VN; Reznick RK; Aggarwal R; Grantcharov TP
    Ann Surg; 2012 May; 255(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 22504187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proficiency Levels and Validity Evidence for Scoring Metrics for a Virtual Reality and Inanimate Robotic Surgery Simulation Curriculum.
    Tellez JC; Radi I; Alterio RE; Nagaraj MB; Baker HB; Scott DJ; Zeh HJ; Polanco PM
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Apr; 81(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 38403503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
    Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of a multidisciplinary virtual reality (VR) robotic surgical curriculum.
    Kim JS; Jonas N; Rizvi TZ; Lin Z; Plewa D; Ricard C; Cheah YL; Simon CJ; Wright V
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2495-2502. PubMed ID: 37526810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving Robotic Skills by Video Review.
    van der Leun JA; Siem G; Meijer RP; Brinkman WM
    J Endourol; 2022 Aug; 36(8):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 35262417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validity evidence for procedural competency in virtual reality robotic simulation, establishing a credible pass/fail standard for the vaginal cuff closure procedure.
    Hovgaard LH; Andersen SAW; Konge L; Dalsgaard T; Larsen CR
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4200-4208. PubMed ID: 29603003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
    Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.
    Lin DW; Romanelli JR; Kuhn JN; Thompson RE; Bush RW; Seymour NE
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 18297349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.
    Sirimanna P; Gladman MA
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Oct; 87(10):760-766. PubMed ID: 28803457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment.
    Katsavelis D; Siu KC; Brown-Clerk B; Lee IH; Lee YK; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 18401648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Virtual Reality
    Cowan A; Chen J; Mingo S; Reddy SS; Ma R; Marshall S; Nguyen JH; Hung AJ
    J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1571-1576. PubMed ID: 34235970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room.
    Kundhal PS; Grantcharov TP
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Mar; 23(3):645-9. PubMed ID: 18622548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.
    Beyer-Berjot L; Berdah S; Hashimoto DA; Darzi A; Aggarwal R
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):932-941. PubMed ID: 27342755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Correlation of Virtual Reality Simulation and Dry Lab Robotic Technical Skills.
    Newcomb LK; Bradley MS; Truong T; Tang M; Comstock B; Li YJ; Visco AG; Siddiqui NY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):689-696. PubMed ID: 29154932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.