These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23584162)

  • 1. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Høy K; Bünger C; Niederman B; Helmig P; Hansen ES; Li H; Andersen T
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Sep; 22(9):2022-9. PubMed ID: 23584162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients.
    Christensen FB; Hansen ES; Eiskjaer SP; Høy K; Helmig P; Neumann P; Niedermann B; Bünger CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(23):2674-83. PubMed ID: 12461393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine.
    Audat Z; Moutasem O; Yousef K; Mohammad B
    Singapore Med J; 2012 Mar; 53(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 22434292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiological and Clinical Comparison of Posterolateral Fusion and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.
    Bozkurt G; Isikay I; Hanalioglu S
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e1060-e1065. PubMed ID: 29864570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Videbaek TS; Christensen FB; Soegaard R; Hansen ES; Høy K; Helmig P; Niedermann B; Eiskjoer SP; Bünger CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2875-80. PubMed ID: 17139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
    Rathbone J; Rackham M; Nielsen D; Lee SM; Hing W; Riar S; Scott-Young M
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1911-1926. PubMed ID: 37071155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Uninstrumented Posterolateral Fusion in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine.
    Jalalpour K; Neumann P; Johansson C; Hedlund R
    Global Spine J; 2015 Aug; 5(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 26225282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion In degenerative spondylolisthesis: An attempt to evaluate the superiority of one method over the other.
    Ghasemi AA
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 150():1-5. PubMed ID: 27565009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Posterior Approach: Is Transforaminal Lateral Interbody Fusion Mandatory?: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 2-Year Follow-Up.
    Challier V; Boissiere L; Obeid I; Vital JM; Castelain JE; Bénard A; Ong N; Ghailane S; Pointillart V; Mazas S; Mariey R; Gille O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(8):531-539. PubMed ID: 27548582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation.
    Christensen FB
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2004 Oct; 75(313):2-43. PubMed ID: 15559781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What every spine surgeon should know about transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery for herniated discs.
    Çaçan MA; Uçar BY
    Int Orthop; 2019 Apr; 43(4):883-889. PubMed ID: 30565176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Wang HW; Hu YC; Wu ZY; Wu HR; Wu CF; Zhang LS; Xu WK; Fan HL; Cai JS; Ma JQ
    Orthop Surg; 2017 Aug; 9(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 28960820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addition of TLIF does not improve outcome over standard posterior instrumented fusion. 5-10 years long-term Follow-up: results from a RCT.
    Høy K; Truong K; Andersen T; Bünger C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):658-665. PubMed ID: 27155825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.