These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23584953)

  • 1. Female mating preferences determine system-level evolution in a gene network model.
    Fierst JL
    Genetica; 2013 Jun; 141(4-6):157-70. PubMed ID: 23584953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals.
    Prum RO
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3085-100. PubMed ID: 20633044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability.
    Jones AG; Arnold SJ; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 17439608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection for distinct gene expression properties favours the evolution of mutational robustness in gene regulatory networks.
    Espinosa-Soto C
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2321-2333. PubMed ID: 27500589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolutionary divergence in competitive mating success through female mating bias for good genes.
    Dugand RJ; Kennington WJ; Tomkins JL
    Sci Adv; 2018 May; 4(5):eaaq0369. PubMed ID: 29806021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental noise, genetic diversity and the evolution of evolvability and robustness in model gene networks.
    Steiner CF
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52204. PubMed ID: 23284934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
    de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Models of sexual selection on a quantitative genetic trait when preference is acquired by sexual imprinting.
    Aoki K; Feldman MW; Kerr B
    Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11263743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?
    Evans JP; Simmons LW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
    Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1395-402. PubMed ID: 17374595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism.
    Lande R; Arnold SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 4094458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mating patterns influence vulnerability to the extinction vortex.
    Godwin JL; Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Martin OY; Gage MJG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Aug; 26(8):4226-4239. PubMed ID: 32558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.