181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23585899)
1. Semantic focusing allows fully automated single-layer slide scanning of cervical cytology slides.
Lahrmann B; Valous NA; Eisenmann U; Wentzensen N; Grabe N
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61441. PubMed ID: 23585899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
Evered A; Dudding N
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 20482714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multilayer outperforms single-layer slide scanning in AI-based classification of whole slide images with low-burden acid-fast mycobacteria (AFB).
Nurzynska K; Li D; Walts AE; Gertych A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jun; 234():107518. PubMed ID: 37018884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.
Wright AM; Smith D; Dhurandhar B; Fairley T; Scheiber-Pacht M; Chakraborty S; Gorman BK; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 22970841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applications and challenges of digital pathology and whole slide imaging.
Higgins C
Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jul; 90(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25978139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Slide Scanning and Segmentation in Fluorescently-labeled Tissues Using a Widefield High-content Analysis System.
Poon CC; Ebacher V; Liu K; Yong VW; Kelly JJP
J Vis Exp; 2018 May; (135):. PubMed ID: 29781988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of 'rapid review' as a method of quality control of cervical smears using the AxioHOME microscope.
Baker RW; Wadsworth J; Brugal G; Coleman DV
Cytopathology; 1997 Apr; 8(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9134333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
Camparo P; Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M
APMIS; 2012 Apr; 120(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22429212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening and dotting virtual slides: A new challenge for cytotechnologists.
Khalbuss WE; Cuda J; Cucoranu IC
Cytojournal; 2013; 10():22. PubMed ID: 24379891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital vs traditional: Are diagnostic accuracy rates similar for glass slides vs whole slide images in a non-gynaecological external quality assurance setting?
Ross J; Greaves J; Earls P; Shulruf B; Van Es SL
Cytopathology; 2018 Aug; 29(4):326-334. PubMed ID: 29665117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current state of whole slide imaging use in cytopathology: Pros and pitfalls.
Eccher A; Girolami I
Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):372-378. PubMed ID: 32020667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the quality of cytopathology whole slide imaging for education from archived cases.
Sura GH; Doan JV; Thrall MJ
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(5):313-319. PubMed ID: 35780060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
Feng M; Deng Y; Yang L; Jing Q; Zhang Z; Xu L; Wei X; Zhou Y; Wu D; Xiang F; Wang Y; Bao J; Bu H
Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 32471471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of tissue folds in whole slide images.
Bautista PA; Yagi Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3669-72. PubMed ID: 19964807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated detection of dual p16/Ki67 nuclear immunoreactivity in liquid-based Pap tests for improved cervical cancer risk stratification.
Gertych A; Joseph AO; Walts AE; Bose S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 May; 40(5):1192-204. PubMed ID: 22215277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of using the Omnyx digital pathology system for cytology practice.
Hanna MG; Pantanowitz L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 31272601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and Efficiency of Deep-Learning-Based Automation of Dual Stain Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Wentzensen N; Lahrmann B; Clarke MA; Kinney W; Tokugawa D; Poitras N; Locke A; Bartels L; Krauthoff A; Walker J; Zuna R; Grewal KK; Goldhoff PE; Kingery JD; Castle PE; Schiffman M; Lorey TS; Grabe N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Jan; 113(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32584382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
