These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23586502)

  • 1. Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Leung K; Dell SD
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2014 Feb; 27(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23586502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro study to investigate the use of a breath-actuated, small-volume, pneumatic nebulizer for the delivery of methacholine chloride bronchoprovocation agent.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Bates SL; Doyle CC
    Respir Care; 2003 Jan; 48(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12556261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.
    El-Gammal AI; Killian KJ; Scime TX; Beaudin S; Schlatman A; Cockcroft DW; Gauvreau GM
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1039-43. PubMed ID: 25871542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are the Reference Values for the Provocative Concentration of Methacholine Appropriate for Children?
    Coates AL; Reyna ME; Doyle CC; Nagel MW
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2024 Oct; 37(5):220-224. PubMed ID: 39212583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
    Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenging the two-minute tidal breathing challenge test.
    Lexmond AJ; Hagedoorn P; Frijlink HW; de Boer AH
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2013 Dec; 26(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 23509936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD
    Davis BE; Simonson SK; Blais CM; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2017 Dec; 152(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 28923758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.
    Blais CM; Cockcroft DW; Veilleux J; Boulay MÈ; Boulet LP; Gauvreau GM; Scime TX; Watson RM; O'Byrne PM; Davis BE
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2018 Apr; 31(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 28813613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth.
    Prieto L; Lopez V; Llusar R; Rojas R; Marin J
    Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 18625670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro estimations of in vivo jet nebulizer efficiency using actual and simulated tidal breathing patterns.
    Bosco AP; Rhem RG; Dolovich MB
    J Aerosol Med; 2005; 18(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 16379618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nebulized albuterol delivery in a model of spontaneously breathing children with tracheostomy.
    Berlinski A
    Respir Care; 2013 Dec; 58(12):2076-86. PubMed ID: 23674810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose vs concentration in methacholine challenge.
    Donado CD
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):598. PubMed ID: 17601278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
    Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two ATS recommended protocols for administration of methacholine are not equal.
    Burke RR; Obeid IM; Williams LK; Morris ZQ
    J Asthma; 2009 Sep; 46(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 19728216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods.
    Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Todd DC; Smycniuk AJ
    Chest; 2005 Mar; 127(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 15764765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardizing dose in dosimetric bronchial challenge tests.
    Malmberg LP; Kauppi P; Mäkelä MJ
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):903-906. PubMed ID: 29345046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of nebulizer type with different pediatric aerosol masks on drug deposition in a model of a spontaneously breathing small child.
    Lin HL; Wan GH; Chen YH; Fink JB; Liu WQ; Liu KY
    Respir Care; 2012 Nov; 57(11):1894-900. PubMed ID: 22418694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Apparatus to Deliver Mannitol Powder for Bronchial Provocation in Children Under Six Years Old.
    Tang P; Leung SS; Hor E; Ruzycki CA; Carrigy NB; Finlay WH; Brannan JD; Devadason S; Anderson SD; Sly PD; Samnick K; Chan HK
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2015 Dec; 28(6):452-61. PubMed ID: 25844950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.
    Crapo RO; Casaburi R; Coates AL; Enright PL; Hankinson JL; Irvin CG; MacIntyre NR; McKay RT; Wanger JS; Anderson SD; Cockcroft DW; Fish JE; Sterk PJ
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2000 Jan; 161(1):309-29. PubMed ID: 10619836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.