These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23586867)
1. Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care. Benatar S; Garrett AB; Howell E; Palmer A Health Serv Res; 2013 Oct; 48(5):1750-68. PubMed ID: 23586867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An alternative model of maternity care for low-risk birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes utilizing the midwifery-based birth center model. Wallace J; Hoehn-Velasco L; Tilden E; Dowd BE; Calvin S; Jolles DR; Wright J; Stapleton S Health Serv Res; 2024 Feb; 59(1):e14222. PubMed ID: 37691323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia. Monk A; Tracy M; Foureur M; Grigg C; Tracy S BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e006252. PubMed ID: 25361840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of midwifery presence in United States centers on labor care and outcomes of low-risk parous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study. Carlson NS; Neal JL; Tilden EL; Smith DC; Breman RB; Lowe NK; Dietrich MS; Phillippi JC Birth; 2019 Sep; 46(3):487-499. PubMed ID: 30414200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Birth Outcomes of Women Using a Midwife versus Women Using a Physician for Prenatal Care. Loewenberg Weisband Y; Klebanoff M; Gallo MF; Shoben A; Norris AH J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jul; 63(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 29944777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Sandall J; Soltani H; Gates S; Shennan A; Devane D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):CD004667. PubMed ID: 27121907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Sandall J; Soltani H; Gates S; Shennan A; Devane D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD004667. PubMed ID: 26370160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008. Stoll K; Kornelsen J J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Birth Outcomes of Women with Obesity Enrolled for Care at Freestanding Birth Centers in the United States. Jevitt CM; Stapleton S; Deng Y; Song X; Wang K; Jolles DR J Midwifery Womens Health; 2021 Jan; 66(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 33377279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study. Christensen LF; Overgaard C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014. Jolles DR; Langford R; Stapleton S; Cesario S; Koci A; Alliman J Birth; 2017 Dec; 44(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 28850706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Family Health and Birth Center--a nurse-midwife-managed center in Washington, DC. Lubic RW; Flynn C Altern Ther Health Med; 2010; 16(5):58-60. PubMed ID: 20882732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey of women's experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England: 2. Specific aspects of care. Macfarlane AJ; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Turner LR Midwifery; 2014 Sep; 30(9):1009-20. PubMed ID: 24929271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK. Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J; PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer. Monk AR; Grigg CP; Foureur M; Tracy M; Tracy SK Midwifery; 2017 Mar; 46():24-28. PubMed ID: 28126592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Tracy SK; Hartz DL; Tracy MB; Allen J; Forti A; Hall B; White J; Lainchbury A; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Bisits A; Homer C; Foureur M; Welsh A; Kildea S Lancet; 2013 Nov; 382(9906):1723-32. PubMed ID: 24050808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes. Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Monk A; Schmied V BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016288. PubMed ID: 28851782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Sandall J; Soltani H; Gates S; Shennan A; Devane D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Aug; (8):CD004667. PubMed ID: 23963739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births. Souter V; Nethery E; Kopas ML; Wurz H; Sitcov K; Caughey AB Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1056-1065. PubMed ID: 31599830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns. Alliman J; Stapleton SR; Wright J; Bauer K; Slider K; Jolles D Birth; 2019 Jun; 46(2):234-243. PubMed ID: 31102319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]