These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23588012)

  • 81. Towards inclusive priority-setting for global health research projects: recommendations for sharing power with communities.
    Pratt B
    Health Policy Plan; 2019 Jun; 34(5):346-357. PubMed ID: 31168568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Mapping public engagement with research in a UK University.
    Grand A; Davies G; Holliman R; Adams A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121874. PubMed ID: 25837803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.
    Kyle R; Dodds S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Mar; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 18825510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. What is the public's role in 'space' policymaking? Images of the public by practitioners of 'space' communication in the United Kingdom.
    Entradas M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 25926503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. What should be given a priority - costly medications for relatively few people or inexpensive ones for many? The Health Parliament public consultation initiative in Israel.
    Guttman N; Shalev C; Kaplan G; Abulafia A; Bin-Nun G; Goffer R; Ben-Moshe R; Tal O; Shani M; Lev B
    Health Expect; 2008 Jun; 11(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 18429997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Redesigning the architecture of policy-making: Engaging with Māori on nanotechnology in New Zealand.
    Munshi D; Kurian PA; Morrison T; Morrison SL
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 25193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Does moral reasoning influence public values for health care priority setting?: A population-based randomized stated preference survey.
    Denburg AE; Ungar WJ; Chen S; Hurley J; Abelson J
    Health Policy; 2020 Jun; 124(6):647-658. PubMed ID: 32405121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Priority setting in public health and health services research.
    Carson N; Ansari Z; Hart W
    Aust Health Rev; 2000; 23(3):46-57. PubMed ID: 11186060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. The public's priorities in health services.
    Kaplan G; Baron-Epel O
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):904-17. PubMed ID: 23551892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Research funding organisations and consumer involvement.
    Entwistle VA; O'Donnell M
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):129-31. PubMed ID: 12886902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Public engagement in research funding: a study of public capabilities and engagement methodology.
    Rowe G; Rawsthorne D; Scarpello T; Dainty JR
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 20533800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Allocating healthcare resources-seriously ill people should have priority.
    Segall M
    BMJ; 2018 Apr; 361():k1817. PubMed ID: 29703725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Grounded citizens' juries: a tool for health activism?
    Kashefi E; Mort M
    Health Expect; 2004 Dec; 7(4):290-302. PubMed ID: 15544682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Investigating public values in health care priority - Chileans´ preference for national health care.
    Núñez A; Chi C
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):416. PubMed ID: 33639903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Public and Stakeholder Engagement and the Built Environment: a Review.
    Leyden KM; Slevin A; Grey T; Hynes M; Frisbaek F; Silke R
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2017 Sep; 4(3):267-277. PubMed ID: 28780629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Making choices in cardiology: difficulties of rationing and equality of access.
    Coats AJ
    Int J Cardiol; 2001 May; 78(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 11376821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. How does participating in a deliberative citizens panel on healthcare priority setting influence the views of participants?
    Reckers-Droog V; Jansen M; Bijlmakers L; Baltussen R; Brouwer W; van Exel J
    Health Policy; 2020 Feb; 124(2):143-151. PubMed ID: 31839335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Sustainable communities: what should our priorities be?
    Brown VA; Ritchie J
    Health Promot J Austr; 2006 Dec; 17(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 17176237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Evaluating community engagement as part of the public health system.
    South J; Phillips G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2014 Jul; 68(7):692-6. PubMed ID: 24671849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Public engagement in setting priorities in health care.
    Bruni RA; Laupacis A; Martin DK;
    CMAJ; 2008 Jul; 179(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18591516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.