BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23589200)

  • 1. Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA; Pyc MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1239-45. PubMed ID: 23589200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty.
    Klier C; Buratto LG
    Neurosci Lett; 2023 Feb; 797():137066. PubMed ID: 36642238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does Item Difficulty Affect the Magnitude of the Retrieval Practice Effect? An Evaluation of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis.
    Lima MFR; Venâncio S; Feminella J; Buratto LG
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23():e31. PubMed ID: 32772963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do Students Effectively Regulate Their Use of Self-Testing as a Function of Item Difficulty?
    Badali S; Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    Educ Psychol Rev; 2022; 34(3):1651-1677. PubMed ID: 35283609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
    Hopper WJ; Huber DE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noncompetitive retrieval practice causes retrieval-induced forgetting in cued recall but not in recognition.
    Grundgeiger T
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):400-8. PubMed ID: 24129441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Progressive retrieval practice leads to greater memory for image-word pairs than standard retrieval practice.
    Liu S; Zheng Z; Kent C; Briscoe J
    Memory; 2022 Aug; 30(7):796-805. PubMed ID: 35638593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1666-1674. PubMed ID: 31161529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.
    Clos M; Bunzeck N; Sommer T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 39(40):7920-7933. PubMed ID: 31405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.
    Little JL; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 25135813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval-induced forgetting: dynamic effects between retrieval and restudy trials when practice is mixed.
    Dobler IM; Bäuml KH
    Mem Cognit; 2013 May; 41(4):547-57. PubMed ID: 23283807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliable retrieval is intrinsically rewarding: Recency, item difficulty, study session memory, and subjective confidence predict satisfaction in word-pair recall.
    Holm L; Wells M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292866. PubMed ID: 37856440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Less we forget: retrieval cues and release from retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Jonker TR; Seli P; Macleod CM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1236-45. PubMed ID: 22733189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.