These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23589200)

  • 21. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.
    Jang Y; Lee H
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retrieval-induced forgetting with novel visual stimuli is retrieval-specific and strength- independent.
    Kovacs O; Harris IM
    Memory; 2022 Mar; 30(3):330-343. PubMed ID: 35535714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medial temporal lobe contributions to cued retrieval of items and contexts.
    Hannula DE; Libby LA; Yonelinas AP; Ranganath C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Oct; 51(12):2322-32. PubMed ID: 23466350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanisms of output interference in cued recall.
    Wilson JH; Kellen D; Criss AH
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 31297701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrieval practice improves item memory but not source memory in the context of stress.
    Smith AM; Race E; Davis FC; Thomas AK
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Jul; 133():24-32. PubMed ID: 30579631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lower constraint testing enhances the testing effect for some contextual details but not others.
    Giannakopoulos KL; McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Urban Levy P; Leshikar ED
    Brain Behav; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e3380. PubMed ID: 38376029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.
    Abel M; Bäuml KH
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26286882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Item-method directed forgetting: Effects at retrieval?
    Taylor TL; Cutmore L; Pries L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():116-123. PubMed ID: 29275948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Functional underpinnings of feedback-enhanced test-potentiated encoding.
    Ludowicy P; Czernochowski D; Arnaez-Telleria J; Gurunandan K; Lachmann T; Paz-Alonso PM
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 May; 33(10):6184-6197. PubMed ID: 36585773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The benefits of retrieval practice depend on item difficulty and intelligence.
    Minear M; Coane JH; Boland SC; Cooney LH; Albat M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1474-1486. PubMed ID: 29648873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrieval practice decreases processing load of recall: Evidence revealed by pupillometry.
    Pajkossy P; Szőllősi Á; Racsmány M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():88-95. PubMed ID: 31301313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. You won't guess that: On the limited benefits of guessing when learning a foreign language.
    Butowska E; Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1033-1047. PubMed ID: 34913140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion?
    Vaughn KE; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):897-909. PubMed ID: 27027887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Pashler H
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):978-88. PubMed ID: 23690275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Control processes in short-term storage: Retrieval strategies in immediate recall depend upon the number of words to be recalled.
    Ward G; Tan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):658-682. PubMed ID: 30617748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.