76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23589995)
1. Invasive cancer of the cervix: does the UK National Health Service screening programme fail due to patients' non-attendance?
Clement KM; Mansour D
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 23589995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer in women aged less than 25: East Kent experience.
Nair MS; Bhandari HM; Nordin AJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):706-8. PubMed ID: 17999298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme.
MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S
J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology.
Talaat A; Brinkmann D; Dhundee J; Hana Y; Bevan J; Irvine R; Bailey S; Woolas R
Cytopathology; 2012 Dec; 23(6):371-7. PubMed ID: 21749501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Changes in awareness of cervical cancer patients after medical treatments and the correlation of cervical screening situation and clinical stage at consultation].
Wang CF; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 22883525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why do women still develop cancer of the cervix despite the existence of a national screening programme?
Brinkmann D; Gladman MA; Norman S; Lawton FG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Mar; 119(1):123-4. PubMed ID: 15734097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of invasive cervical cancers and uptake of disclosure of results: an audit of procedures and response.
Prabakar I; Moss EL; Douce G; Parkes J; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2012 Jun; 23(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 22494343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rational care or rationing care? The case of cervical screening across the United Kingdom.
Flynn H; Lewis P
Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 112(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 23910733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality control assurance in national screening programmes for cervical cancer.
Hadwin RJ; Walker PG
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2003 Sep; 32(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 14626791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invasive cancer of the cervix in British Columbia: a review of the demography and screening histories of 437 cases seen from 1985-1988.
Anderson GH; Benedet JL; Le Riche JC; Matisic JP; Thompson JE
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 1603476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cervical cancer in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. Tumor stage, histological tumor type, age and screening participation of 985 patients].
Marquardt K; Stubbe M; Broschewitz U
Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26660458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for cancer of the cervix in elderly women.
Fletcher A
Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8681):97-9. PubMed ID: 1967429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The management of cervical carcinoma within the south west region of England. Expert Tumour Panel.
Jackson S; Murdoch J; Howe K; Bedford C; Sanders T; Prentice A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Feb; 104(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9070127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study.
Hall MT; Simms KT; Lew JB; Smith MA; Brotherton JM; Saville M; Frazer IH; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2019 Jan; 4(1):e19-e27. PubMed ID: 30291040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix in women age 25 or less.
Maddux HR; Varia MA; Spann CO; Fowler WC; Rosenman JG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Sep; 19(3):701-6. PubMed ID: 2211218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Sasieni P; Castanon A; Cuzick J
Int J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 125(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 19449379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing among Non-Attenders Increases Attendance to the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.
Enerly E; Bonde J; Schee K; Pedersen H; Lönnberg S; Nygård M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0151978. PubMed ID: 27073929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
